beaverden

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by beaverden 7y ago

   Reminds me of the Monese rush my colleagues have. I heard they're giving referral money to both the inviting and the invited. So far, I've seen only the person who actively invites people to actually use it, because no one else a
2. 2.▲
   by beaverden 7y ago

   The data is empirical, based on comparative results of some files I've mananged to get my hands on over the years. I can't argue on MitM, because I haven't worked with traffic and traffic analysis, but when it comes to malic
3. 3.▲
   by beaverden 7y ago

   What I can say from a more or less objective standpoint, the best vendors according to a response-time metric are Eset, Kaspersky and Bitdefender. Each of them have their own weaknesses and I do not know what is the performance impact for
4. 4.▲
   by beaverden 7y ago

   I disagree with the point you made about 0days and detection rates. Defender has less false positives, but almost never catch the files that actually matter, like important 0days or antiemulation and anti-unpack files. They are pretty slow