beatbrokedown

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by beatbrokedown 9y ago

   If you make one small change to this file you can cause clang and gcc to both prevent this from compiling if you are using warnings. namespace { void NeverCalled() { Do = EraseAll; } } or marking NeverCalled as static itself. R
2. 2.▲
   by beatbrokedown 10y ago

   Fixes https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED...
3. 3.▲
   GCC 6.2 Released(gcc.gnu.org)

   1 points by beatbrokedown 10y ago|1 comments
4. 4.▲
   by beatbrokedown 11y ago

   My fuzzing went: 8 4 2 (no) 1 2 3 (yes) 1 1 1 (no) 1 100 123 (yes) 1.0 1.1 1.2 (yes) answer: incrementing numbers
5. 5.▲
   by beatbrokedown 12y ago

   Interesting the main page http://gcc.gnu.org/ lists 4.9 as the current release as opposed to Development release.
6. 6.▲
   GCC 4.9 Release Series – Changes, New Features, and Fixes(gcc.gnu.org)

   134 points by beatbrokedown 12y ago|39 comments
7. 7.▲
   by beatbrokedown 14y ago

   Just in case anyone forgets this is from 1994(it's in the title!). Typical modern C++ has been using this pattern for quite a while (boost::function / boost::bind) and it is now even part of the standard (std::function / std::bind). So don'