beaeglebeachh

7 ms·

1.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
The state in this case is merely your select buddies, who also murder and rob others and especially the weak. While I acknowledge the difficulties in justice with murder you're just arguing over which group of buddies is the bestest, a
2.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Yep first thing that happened was shitcan the kids. They knew kids had very little relative risk but the argument was it's worth them losing an education, you don't want Grandma to die do you?
3.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
I don't view justice as a responsibility but rather as a right for the victim. Whether the victim stops the rape with a 9mm hole in the aggressors head, sends posse, or sends a judge to do it are private matter for the victim to choos
4.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
I lived in Rojava and they are quite capitalist outside a few sectors. Go someplace like qamislo and it's basically capitalism with street vendors and stark disparity of wealth and poverty. However you can get free bread by simply ap
5.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Take away the state and I can self defend my capital from aggression with ak47. Under anarchism then what you going to do? Either you attack me, get someone else to attack me, or have a 'not' state do it. Or just maybe leave me
6.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
I don't believe in stealing labor. I think you should be able to trade your labor for gold or whatever other valuables you like.
7.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
The state doesn't enforce anything resembling justice for rape. Rape is rarely prosecuted and difficult to prove in a court of law.
8.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Yep which is why I'm ancap anarchist not socialist anarchist which seems almost an oxymoron. You cannot take things from people, like means of production they've produced, and force them to share without aggression. All anarchism
9.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Have you ever built a house? It would not even be possible for me to build one with inspections, I would lose my day job. And my house was 40k to diy, do you have any idea how burdensome an up to code contractor installed sprinkler system
10.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
I'm arguing it's a good thing California will let humans choose to man make a house wildfire trap (forest didn't pick you to put a house there) and they should apply their standard of "die in a fire if you like" to
11.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
My permit says "NO building code or utility inspections will be performed." I signed that "right" away with the county recorder, it was no problem. Been able to do that for 2 decades in my county. Turns out when people
12.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Yes west of Chinatown. Cermak I think. Spice warehouse in days of old IIRC. Was used for raves decade+ ago. Place is a trip. I camped on top of it once when I was homeless. I've forgotten of that place for years. Truly magical. Th
13.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Obtaining information through books is like trying to put out a fire by sucking water out through a straw. The printing press was great but it's a slow and constrained way to get into from the greatest minds. I read voraciously as a ch
14.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
This is why I'm for total deregulation of healthcare. Government fucks it up so bad hamstringing access that some hack work with 15 minutes of YouTube training plus whatever pills drop out the dark web is often better than not being a
15.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Covenant is the equivalent of a Eula poisoned into software you've purchased. If you own it you ought have the ability to disable the Eula. A covenant is weird because it more often than not is contract entered unilaterally by some d
16.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
But it is anti property rights to force someone to rent or sell to poc. Of course without government influence this becomes a dumb business plan because it depressed the utility of your property and hands business to competitors. I would a
17.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Mutual benefit is a thing, industry works fine when everyone is driven by selfishness as no one agrees to a transaction unless both parties are better off. I'd much sooner live with that coworker in the steppes than cheerman mao or oth
18.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
If the covenant was added by a dead guy and the counterparty doesn't exist but now it's enforced by a government court against the wishes of the property owner who owns the 'right' is it really property rights at that po
19.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Yeah this is why I bought land with no HOA and no covenants and basically no codes and liberal zoning. Sure the roads are dirt 4x4 and my neighbors have livestock and wild noises at all times but if I wanted to regulate other land I'd
20.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Lol this is the myth isn't it. Reality is getting screamed at by a toddler while you single-handedly build a depression era shack in desert wasteland for 40k, while simultaneously working full time and somehow caring for your kids too.
21.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
I see all liberty as stemming from private property rights. Thus the freedom to roam can only take away your liberty, not add to it.
22.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Dumb laws made it prohibitively expensive to build most places, then idiotic monetary policy of the fed caused price explosions particularly during the COVID era. Then all the real estate got locked up in near 0% mortgages people will neve
23.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Deal. Not like they cared about law anyway, so it'll change nothing. They're already looking at life for the kind of armed trafficking they're already doing.
24.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
I'm fine with keeping private property rights so there's no guessing and trespassing is hardline crossing that fence. It was merely an offer as a potential trade since you wanted something for free that involved guessing who is a
25.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
If you don't understand why, I'm going to guess you haven't spent much time in remote US/Mexico border regions far from ports of entry.
26.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Hmm might want to reword it as reasonably believe, then let the jury figure it as they did with the rancher with an AK who recently walked.
27.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
Your asking for me to relinquish some of my private property rights. Obviously I want something in trade, it's not gonna be unilateral charity so traffickers can be judge jury and executioner against my children who roam my property.
28.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
I would compromise if they offer me in trade ability to shoot trespassers/"roamers" who are criminal traffickers.
29.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
In my case, I live near the border and such use 'just roaming lmao' would become perfect cover for drug traffickers, gangs, sex trafficking and all kind of bad stuff I don't want to be liable for when people coming stomping o
30.
by beaeglebeachh 2y ago
What you're saying is how people generally think the prohibited possessor law works, but it's not how it works in practice. It says nothing of drug possession, only gun/ammo possession by someone who uses or addicted to ill

More ›