be-ez

6 ms·

1.
by be-ez 8y ago
https://github.com/cruise-automation/webviz (GM Cruise LLC) I'm looking forward to seeing more of the technology working in the AV space get opened.
2.
by be-ez 8y ago
Your right I should have included the disclaimer that I previously worked there.
3.
by be-ez 8y ago
Your right I probably should have disclosed that I previously worked there but it's fairly clear from my post history so I figured it didn't matter. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
4.
by be-ez 8y ago
The original comment wrote off the report as "some unsourced numbers in a press release" - I aimed to show it was more than that. Impossible has quite the academic rigor. Agreed - there's plenty of room to interpret the speci
5.
by be-ez 8y ago
The price of beef does not include the environmental impact so I'm not sure this is a good indicator of the impact of making a product. Beef/Milk in the USA is also subsidized...
6.
by be-ez 8y ago
It sounds like you didn't read the report or check the references on page 26. I recommend reading this paper and coming to your own conclusion about "almost no doubt". Within sustainability science, there is little debate abo
7.
by be-ez 8y ago
I think this is correct. There is a core group of "meat purists" who define eating beef as being American or vice versa.
8.
by be-ez 8y ago
Impossible is not currently available directly to consumers. They do not make a meatloaf - it is possible the grocery store bought the raw product and is selling their own meatloaf.
9.
by be-ez 8y ago
When compared to meat there is almost no doubt that Impossible is better for the environment. Impossible has an environmental mission first. Checkout the sustainability report from 2017 http://www.ift.org/~/media/
10.
by be-ez 8y ago
Impossible Foods ( https://impossiblefoods.com ) | Redwood City, CA | Software Engineer, Technical Product Manager | Full-time | Onsite Impossible Foods was founded 7 years ago to invent an efficient, sustainable way to transform