bcb1276

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bcb1276 4y ago

   I believe the comment is referring to the part of the report which explains the 3.4% figure is based on taxes paid relative to net worth growth. Specifically, it says : “As we showed last year, the richest avoid income when they can. Then t
2. 2.▲
   by bcb1276 7y ago

   No. The constitution generally doesn’t restrict a private company like FB from imposing restrictions on speech
3. 3.▲
   by bcb1276 7y ago

   I’m a lawyer. This doesn’t make sense. What exactly did the clauses say? Did the “investor” make his (non) investment contingent on some types of conditions precedent that you didn’t meet? If yes, then he doesn’t have to fund his investment
4. 4.▲
   by bcb1276 7y ago

   I’m a lawyer who worked for years at a hedge fund. (Also private equity funds). You can probably find one or more low cost ETFs that pursue whatever strategy(ies) you find interesting. You won’t have to deal with filing a K1 (partnership ta
5. 5.▲
   by bcb1276 7y ago

   The lock up agreement is publicly available on the SEC’s website (it’s a material contract and therefore required to be filed as an exhibit to the registration statement). The agreement itself is part of the Investors’ Rights Agreement. See