bbkane

24 ms·

1. 361.▲
   by bbkane 2y ago

   I agree, though I was really surprised to learn this when reading Go code. Much easier to skip over than I was expecting it to be
2. 362.▲
   by bbkane 2y ago

   I haven't had time to really try to write anything in it, but https://gleam.run/ looks really good too. Like Elm for backend + frontend!
3. 363.▲
   by bbkane 2y ago

   Even food goes bad after a while :)
4. 364.▲
   by bbkane 2y ago

   True, but you can represent that in the db as a a CLI invocation to run in a subshell. The big gain from something like carapace or my theoretical SQLite-based completion system is faster startup time. I had to remove zsh-completions from m
5. 365.▲
   by bbkane 2y ago

   I tried this but couldn't get the completions to load. I think it's a really good idea though (much faster than zsh script completions), so hopefully soon I can retry the install and either get it working or open an issue. One des
6. 366.▲
   by bbkane 2y ago

   Keep an eye on https://lapce.dev/ and https://zed.dev/ . Both immature, but show a lot of promise! Also both open source, so (in theory, I haven't tried) you can contribute patches to fic your issues
7. 367.▲
   by bbkane 2y ago

   How does this compare to using wasm to communicate between languages?
8. 368.▲
   by bbkane 2y ago

   Yes, I run into this too!!
9. 369.▲
   by bbkane 2y ago

   > You are not arguing this from PoV of evaluating .NET as a technology or seeking to better the software ecosystem I am evaluating .NET from exactly this perspective, and I heavily consider ecosystem openness in that evaluation. .NET has
10. 370.▲
    by bbkane 2y ago

    I'd also recommend https://wezfurlong.org/wezterm/index.html . I switched to it from iTerm2 for the reasons in https://github.com/bbkane/dotfiles/tree/master/wezterm#iterm... (
11. 371.▲
    by bbkane 2y ago

    I suppose you didn't read the link. It's not complaining about usability of deployed .NET apps on Linux, it's complaining about the openness of the tooling and community of the .NET ecosystem.
12. 372.▲
    by bbkane 2y ago

    Visual Studio is not open source and neither is .NET tooling for VS Code. https://isdotnetopen.com/ explains a lot of this and has made me avoid .NET as well. Competing languages are pretty good these days and a lot more op
13. 373.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    I also blame the bad zsh docs. I'm trying to write a zsh completion script for a CLI I wrote and I'm intimidated by the lack of examples in the official docs. I'm forced to turn to 3rd party examples and they have differences
14. 374.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    I use Markdown, with no license. (Usually) Works fine for me. Not sure why I need proprietary file formats only usable by on vendor's software. I'm somewhat joking (obviously MSFT file formats can do a lot more than md if you need
15. 375.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    And (in a simple, non-TLS, local storage configuration), as a static binary OpenObserve is incredibly easy to install locally or with Ansible ( https://github.com/bbkane/shovel_ansible/blob/master/openobs
16. 376.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    I recommend the Caravaggio episodes of https://artholespodcast.com/ to everyone! Michael Anthony does a REALLY good job contextualizing Caravaggios crazy actions and giving a "window" into life in Italy then.
17. 377.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    Do build-excluded files get tested with `go test`? (tbf, not sure it's practical to test most scripty tasks)
18. 378.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    I use OpenObserve and I quite enjoy it
19. 379.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    You might try https://schemaspy.org/ - it generates a website with ER diagrams that only go one or two relationships out, but they have clickable table names to get to the next diagram
20. 380.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    I love the diagram maker, and this looks like it has fewer dependencies than https://schemaspy.org/ (which is still FANTASTIC for larger databases).
21. 381.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    We had similar experiences with my wife's Surface and her brother's Surface
22. 382.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    Yes I think so- it manipulates and orchestrates the compiled C++ code underneath.
23. 383.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    "small embeddable dynamic languages" are usually used to configure or program other larger compiled applications. This is bes understood by example: https://create.roblox.com/docs/tutorials/scripting&#x2F
24. 384.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    Fantastic! Would you like me to make an issue for this?
25. 385.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    Wow! Is there any way this could support SQLite databases?
26. 386.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    Because GitHub is non-FOSS or owned by Microsoft or something? I use GitHub, and I don't really have any complaints...
27. 387.▲
    Ask HN: What would you do if you cracked RSA encryption?

    9 points by bbkane 3y ago|11 comments
28. 388.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    I used to feel that way, and in some sense I still do, but in practice it fits right in with my other linters so it's not any trouble. Config language design seems to have a surprisingly "bumpy" design space, where optimizing
29. 389.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    Point taken, but you can mitigate a lot of this with yamllint.
30. 390.▲
    by bbkane 3y ago

    I think open core means the authors maintain a less capable open source version of their project. I don't think there's any expectations beyond that about internal hosting capabilities or anything else, certainly not in the licens