bbgtpm

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by bbgtpm 5y ago

   My heart breaks for you and your siblings, I'm so terribly sorry. I wonder if a better delineation might be "broken" households (divorced or not) versus functional/happy ones. One thing I didn't mention is that as k
2. 2.▲
   by bbgtpm 5y ago

   Oh absolutely! The psychological safety benefits of having a stable home, the ability to "be a kid" with emotional support from parents instead of having to grow up way too soon and serve as their emotional support, the luxury of
3. 3.▲
   by bbgtpm 5y ago

   Right there with you, my mother entered marriage number four as I turned 10 (not a competition - at least not one I feel I won). Hearing parents talk about how they went the extra mile to make things better for the kids after the divorce ho
4. 4.▲
   by bbgtpm 10y ago

   I don't think so. Money creation through loans by banks is vital to the proper functioning of the economy, but is tightly regulated by the Federal Reserve and various other agencies because unchecked lending has in the past resulted in
5. 5.▲
   by bbgtpm 11y ago

   Sure it can, banks would just have to modify the exchange rate between physical cash and bank deposits.
6. 6.▲
   by bbgtpm 11y ago

   Banks allocate real resources in the economy, and the instrument by which they exercise this power is making loans (printing money) for projects they deem appropriate. I think often people get the causality backwards: banks don't have