Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
batista
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
34 ms
·
241.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
But you already monetized the visits, right? You should build on that. I don't think 20,000 likes are that much to build something on.
242.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> Node.js does help you to fail fast. Quote of the year!
243.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> Now, if they can figure out how a boy band that started out with a following of veritable teenyboppers wound up receiving near-universal adoration, I'll be really impressed. Or you could, you know, buy one of the tens of books in the
244.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
Non open source language and no huge company shoving it down people's throats (like MS/VB): people won't care. At best it will be a niche like Rebol.
245.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> There has to be more ways to make money with all these users and all these likes. What can I do? Likes is not a currency. Get a job.
246.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> I'm a stay-at-home dad. I very often wake up thinking about how to approach my son's disability, and I'm glad that I don't have to deal with interruptions to my thought process for something as pointless as "which shirt should I wear
247.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
40.000 in grants? Mentioned in The Atlantic, Forbes, and US News? Sorry, but that doesn't sound impressive at all. If you had exited for several tens of millions, or build a hundred million long-term company, that might have been something
248.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
Just the sponsored feed brings something like $150,000-$200,000 a year. Add the Deck ads and the t-shirt sales, and you are there.
249.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
I read it more as "a hack, coming with nothing interesting to write about, stretches it as far as it goes with lame bs..."
250.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
Chickens eat human feces too, but they are not considered "unclean". Plus, the one doesn't exclude the other. The taboo could be because of the reasons the parent mentioned, and the "unclean due to eating feces" could just be a post-fact ra
251.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> I call that BS. That is your small thinking and so you should limit yourself to it. I say go emulate successful people and do what you want to do. Right, go emulate the dressing habits of successful people, that's so much better advi
252.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> It's not so much "saving 10 seconds" as it is "avoiding cognitive context switching". Humanity FAIL. As if you have some very crucial things to decide on the 15 minutes you spend waking up, dressing, shaving and such... What "context
253.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
I say it. People don't like emulations of other people, especially if the "emulators" consider some superficial thing like this part of their success.
254.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
Because of some misguided idea that picking a shirt to wear takes too long off of your morning? Hint: unless you're Lady Gaga, it does not.
255.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> This whole thing is a difficult issue. Who is to decide what devices look similar enough, to deserve calling it a “copy”? Here's a guideline: if there is a document in your company saying ("let's copy this thing") --as in Samsung's c
256.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
Nope. That's not the answer. We will be having the exact same discussion in 50 years.
257.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
That's stylistic homage to old (30,40 year old) designs, and in a new, totally different context, like Spielberg basing Indiana Jones on forties adventure movies, or Lucas basing the space battles on dogfighting scenes from WWII movies. Bra
258.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
Dear Applicant, while I appreciate the originality of your response, I'm not particularly interested on following on this offer anymore for several reasons: 1) I don't like people forcing me to subscribe and check their profile on some thir
259.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> Are you suggesting there is some sort of over-arching group representing our society that should be defining these sorts of norms? Yes, exactly. I suggest that "society" itself is that very "over arching group". So what I mean by thi
260.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> Congrats for successfully getting your rails site to load faster, but it's still slow. Looks pretty snappy to me. > Honestly, what you're doing at this point is delaying the big rewrite. That sounds brilliant! As in: http://www
261.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> It depends. Will accessory prices come down with the iPhone5? If so, it's an unfair comparison to compare current prices. What kind of logic is this? They didn't go down with the previous 4 models, why even assume they will go down w
262.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
Well, you got a point there. It's not being X is a necessary conclusion of you stating Y --you can take them apart and answer any of them you like. I just assumed that it is so, because that's how privileged people I know talk (conversely,
263.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
>* And the main distinguishing feature of that new 9/12 device? A form factor very close to Samsung's last two flagship models.* You mean "a bigger screen"? Well, it could have had even less distinguishing factors and it would have been
264.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
Even 500 dollars a year ($1.45 for one person) income puts you in the "top 80%" of the world, which means there's a billion people that make LESS than that. $1,000 a year puts you in the 50% of the world per income. http://www.globalrichli
265.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> Food insecurity is not starvation Pointless pedantic distinction from the well-fed. Try it for a month and then we can talk. I have some friends in MS that beg to differ. Not to mention that it comes with tons of other stuff like lac
266.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> We can't really be sure of that can we. No, but we can be sure that conceptually it's far better than the monolithic practice, which has been shown in the past to slow down the standardising process. > What we can be sure of is t
267.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
Nothing of the sort actually. On the contrary, it shows how by breaking things into smaller modules instead of a monolithic one, they got things moving along faster.
268.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
That's because of adoption and less sites linking and discussing go topics at the moment. I think if you could Google when Python was in it's infancy, you would get 100s results for pythons (the snakes) before you saw Python pages... Google
269.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> So then Apple are now like the guys still in leather helmets that have been running exactly the same pass play for five years No, they are the guys that created the whole game field as a massive market niche, coming from completely o
270.
▲
by
batista
14y ago
> Our society decided there's no survival value in living a virtuous life: saving money for a rainy day, delaying gratification. I think the problem is that it's not society that decided that (as a collective) but individuals. And it's
More ›