2 ms·
>Congrats for successfully getting your rails site to load faster, but it's still slow. Looks pretty snappy to me. >Honestly, what you're doing at this point
by batista 14y ago
>Congrats for successfully getting your rails site to load faster, but it's still slow.
Looks pretty snappy to me.
>Honestly, what you're doing at this point is delaying the big rewrite.
That sounds brilliant! As in:
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html
- 23david 14y agoThat's definitely a classic article. It just doesn't apply here. Hard to explain why without going into a ton of details, but basically: Layervault in 2012 != Netscape in 1996 Netscape's crufty spaghetti C code != Layervault's elegant but slow Rails code