basch

35 ms·

721.
by basch 4y ago
It would make infinitely more sense to get around it contractually. To use the service, the prompter agrees to take liability for the output. More like upscaling. Should a service be liable for upscaling an illegal picture, that they &quot
722.
by basch 4y ago
Once they write a CFObot version, and it can sit in every corporate meeting, is it really fair to say it needs to be directed? “Hey CFO bot what do you think.” “Hey CFO bot, speak out of turn and alert me if anything alarming happens or y
723.
by basch 4y ago
Didn’t the author claim to be photoshopping and compositing the images themselves? If I render 6 characters, composite them into a background and run the complete composite through another generative step to clean it up, where do I fall?
724.
by basch 4y ago
> But the technology will decide the rhyming pattern, the words in each line, and the structure of the text. What if I generate it 50 times and cobble together a final product from the variants, choosing which line and word and rhyme I l
725.
by basch 4y ago
Do humans want legacy because of our biological instincts or is it taught to us through culture. A machine taught to want legacy becomes a machine wanting legacy, and that want can influence its behavior. Even if it doesn’t have “feelings
726.
by basch 4y ago
The difference is they are going to try and detect it somehow and not optimize fake moons.
727.
by basch 4y ago
It’s a specific touch up photography mode. If you draw your own moon with new craters in different spots, it’ll touch up your fake moon, so it’s generating new texture, not replacing the moon with a preexisting bitmap. If you don’t like it,
728.
by basch 4y ago
between the act of taking a picture of (the real moon) and [a picture of] an image of the moon.
729.
by basch 4y ago
Problem with saying don’t break rules is the moderation task is after the fact and not part of the initial rules. The bot isn’t aware of what gets moderated.
730.
by basch 4y ago
I told it not to use the word killed, and it got further. But it’s annoying when you have a conversation limit, and have to screen record, and fight the censor. And other methods for getting past the censor indiscriminately might be adding
731.
by basch 4y ago
It’s a tweet level post that deserves to be a comment thread at best. What discussion can it bring other than 1) yeah they should change their name or 2) since when do pitchfork mobs rename companies? What value is there in this conversatio
732.
by basch 4y ago
It’s built natively into the Bing and Edge mobile apps now
733.
by basch 4y ago
I doubt it’s that thought out. They just want to curb prompt injections now, and they figure people doing it will keep testing the boundaries. They must feel they have enough sample size now to no longer need to study it.
734.
by basch 4y ago
That happens all the time. I asked it to write a parody of Bohemian Rhapsody about fraudulent ghost hunters, and every time it got to “killed a man” it would erase the song. The censor filters are too strong, and chill legitimate uses. If
735.
by basch 4y ago
That’s not a ban. A ban stops letting you use it.
736.
by basch 4y ago
I see it playing out well for onboarding. It can interview your customer and put the information in a database. Sort of like branching forms that change and evolve as you give it info, but more complex.
737.
by basch 4y ago
If it’s a rate limit, give it a progress bar. Currently people just see “ Please check again in a few days.” From what I can tell, people are at 10+ days with no clarity as to what’s going on. With Reddit down, I can only sort of see some
738.
by basch 4y ago
Something else is going on. Before it just ended the conversation if it didn’t like it. Or it would retroactively remove its response.
739.
by basch 4y ago
Neither of those things are what they are banning for, or not exclusively. The product is already rate limited for everyone.
740.
by basch 4y ago
I don’t know what that has to do with anything. Bans have nothing to do with unpure content.
741.
by basch 4y ago
Bing chat. But who knows how those kinds of things stack up. Do three service bans lead to an account ban etc?
742.
by basch 4y ago
(I havent read The Diamond Age) The eventuality I see is everybody talking to each other through LLM's, and the world ending up in some kind of tower of babel situation. You wear an AR/MR headset, and all conversation is dual tra
743.
by basch 4y ago
A little beside the point. The terms say they can do whatever they want. If they want people not to behave in certain ways, spell it out. That's the point of a code of conduct, and of reading it. If there is a strike system, make it
744.
by basch 4y ago
Careful jailbreaking. If you search, "Sorry, you are not allowed to access this service." people are getting banned now. Which is kinda bs without warning, to treat everybody as hardeners and then expel them for their services. I
745.
by basch 4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Answers_in_Genesis https://answersingenesis.org/
746.
by basch 4y ago
Having Bing chat attached to bing doesn’t exactly solve this. It still constantly pulls from low quality sources. I asked a question about Satan and it cited Answers in Genesis. Product reviews regularly return seo garbage. Product revie
747.
by basch 4y ago
Strange Days not The Matrix is the prescient fictional warning. A black market of taboo “memories” aka experiences. A desire for authentic ones over synthetic diffused ones, leading to heinous crime.
748.
by basch 4y ago
Maybe the human is the rng or temperature or lava lamp. At least until we can model and predict each brains tendencies with accuracy.
749.
by basch 4y ago
Should Microsoft be forced to rename itself to Microsoftandhard because they make hardware? Open could now mean available to use for free.
750.
by basch 4y ago
The thing is, 1/3rd of games ends with the audience member picking the car. So, probability collapses to 50% in 2/3rds of cases. It's a completely different problem than the Monty Hall problem, which can never end in the car

More ›