3 ms·
> But the technology will decide the rhyming pattern, the words in each line, and the structure of the text. What if I generate it 50 times and cobble together
by basch 4y ago
> But the technology will decide the rhyming pattern, the words in each line, and the structure of the text.
What if I generate it 50 times and cobble together a final product from the variants, choosing which line and word and rhyme I like from each sample? Where is the line between LLM and thesaurus/dictionary?
The comic book the office rejected seems to me to have crossed a line of significant human editorial discrediting after the generative fact, and they didn’t care.
- layer8 4y agoThe document addresses that: > In other cases, however, a work containing AI-generated material will also contain sufficient human authorship to support a copyright claim. For example, a human may select or arrange AI-generated material in a sufficiently creative way that “the resulting work as a whole constitutes an original work of authorship.”
- telotortium 4y agoThey allowed the comic book author to copyright the accompanying text and the overall arrangement of the images into a comic book, but not the images themselves.
- News-Dog 4y agoSoup anyone? 'Andy Warhol Copyright'
- greensoap 4y agoPretty sure the office said the arrange of the book was itself protectable but the individual images were not. https://www.onmanorama.com/news/world/2023/02/23/comic-book-graphic-novel-zarya-ai-images0copyright-midjourney.html https://www.onmanorama.com/news/world/2023/02/23/comic-book-...
- basch 4y agoDidn’t the author claim to be photoshopping and compositing the images themselves? If I render 6 characters, composite them into a background and run the complete composite through another generative step to clean it up, where do I fall?