bartaz

3 ms·

1.
by bartaz 15y ago
Probably would. I was thinking about using it. I'm just still a little bit skeptical about JS lib re-downloading, parsing and appending my CSS.
2.
by bartaz 15y ago
I didn't find it offensive at all, no worries :) Simply the interest about this project is far more bigger than I could expect and more and more people are confused about the browser support in it. And it really is confusing because today i
3.
by bartaz 15y ago
True, but majority of the users doesn't know if their browser supports hardware accelerated CSS3 and has fast JS VM. And they probably don't care. Listing browsers (or with hardware acceleration browsers+systems) helps to know what configur
4.
by bartaz 15y ago
I was a little bit wrong about that. It run great on Firefox 10 on Win and Mac because they have hardware acceleration. Firefox 10 on my Ubuntu doesn't do hardware acceleration so even that it supports CSS 3D animations are slow as hell. Mi
5.
by bartaz 15y ago
from technical point of view they do support it (when it comes to iPhone/iPad and newest Android) the problem may be a performance and different way of positioning things on the screen but I'd really like to see in running on iPad, maybe on
6.
by bartaz 15y ago
Probably it's not stated clear enough (it's a very early release and I wasn't expecting such a buzz around it) that impress.js is meant to be responsible only of positioning the step elements (based on data attributes) and animating between
7.
by bartaz 15y ago
It's HTML, you can put any image or video you want. Yoda is "hardcoded" because it's just a demo.