bahjoite

14 ms·

91.
by bahjoite 10y ago
An example: I have a website and I don't need to know the IP addresses, browser info or referrer urls of visiting User Agents. So allowing Apache to log that information would be "collecting too much data". Thus, Apache is c
92.
by bahjoite 10y ago
5) is probably the most depressing thing I've read for some time. We should all make the effort to do exactly the opposite.
93.
by bahjoite 10y ago
And the only time you might decide to hide the fact is when faced with the knowledge that someone may come, at any time, and force the door open.
94.
by bahjoite 10y ago
I think this too and am considering running a web crawler full time. If enough people were willing to do this we could create a massive distributed index to rival google's.
95.
by bahjoite 10y ago
> The least proud people will probably be the families of victims- and they matter the most Why do the families of victims matter the most? Does not every person matter equally?
96.
by bahjoite 10y ago
> It's saying "don't use Signal because Signal is less than perfect". This is mis-categorisation. The article says "I won't recommend the use of Signal" and gives reasons and desired improvements.
97.
by bahjoite 10y ago
> If you follow the links, you'll end up here: https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity16/technical... and just to add, the paper itself and a video of the author's presentation are available
98.
by bahjoite 10y ago
> Similar to how choosing to not abide by the wish that you pay for products. It is not a "wish" when payment is demanded for a product. You violate a social contract and a legal statute when not paying for a product for which
99.
by bahjoite 10y ago
> They aren't expressly allowing the content to be consumed for free any more than a store-front that shows off products is allowing them to be taken for free. False equivalence. Further, they certainly are allowing the content to b
100.
by bahjoite 10y ago
I disagree that paying for the subscription is the ethical thing to do. The publisher expressly allows the content to be consumed for free - they don't require payment for the content. Therefore it is not unethical to consume that con
101.
by bahjoite 10y ago
Correct. People using ad blockers want to block ads. They don't necessarily want to pay to avoid seeing ads. They may still wish to pay for content they like. The two aren't mutually exclusive.
102.
by bahjoite 10y ago
Leaving aside that some people feel that ads are an imposition: we are not obliged to see ads, nor to execute code delivered by a website. The web is a public place where the majority of content is free to consume. Those publishers who wish
103.
by bahjoite 10y ago
Of course not. Using an ad blocker means that ads are blocked at all sites. Paying for content at one site clearly doesn't affect the ads delivered by other sites.
104.
Our proposal to get the CC logo and icons into Unicode(creativecommons.org)
1 points by bahjoite 10y ago|1 comments
105.
by bahjoite 10y ago
This isn't anonymous messaging, but pseudonymous messaging.
106.
by bahjoite 10y ago
It seems Tor users cannot expect privacy in any real sense. Using Tor, they can reduce the identifying information they provide to operators of websites they visit, but they cannot expect to benefit from any more security than that. I find
107.
by bahjoite 10y ago
This is excellent. It could be improved by adding a very short summary of each bias. This would help the reader to drill-down to a specific bias of interest.
108.
Jump to Full Encryption(github.com)
1 points by bahjoite 10y ago|0 comments
109.
The RFC 5114 saga(blog.intothesymmetry.com)
2 points by bahjoite 10y ago|0 comments
110.
by bahjoite 10y ago
Which is the misleading claim?
111.
by bahjoite 10y ago
Were you already familiar with what was disclosed in the leaked documents and accompanying reporting? Would you agree that the programs revealed in them go far beyond the programs previous whistle-blowers revealed? Did you know beforehand t
112.
by bahjoite 10y ago
> Wanting the country you live in to be safer and stronger against outside threats is not patriotism. It's just basic self-interest. Wanting the country you live in to be safer and stronger is certainly not basic self-interest: that
113.
by bahjoite 10y ago
>Redirect is the cleanest solution. Exactly. Submitting tokens via GET requests (as is necessary for an emailed token) should be handled in the same way as POST (POST-redirect-GET): the resource which validates the token should not be t
114.
by bahjoite 10y ago
According to the flow chart, one doesn't need to "Look for an existing bug report before reporting the bug" if one doesn't like the software.
115.
Judge provides strong case against software patents in IV v. Symantec(fsf.org)
2 points by bahjoite 10y ago|0 comments
116.
CTCSS fingerprinting: a method for transmitter identification(windytan.com)
3 points by bahjoite 10y ago|0 comments
117.
by bahjoite 10y ago
I'm procrastinating instead of beginning the documentation for some code. I've decided to start (this minute) in medias res . Thanks for the tip.
118.
by bahjoite 10y ago
Agreed - it's what I meant by that third sentence. There are of course reasons to revoke one of a collection of keys, for example natural end-of-life rotation, weak key generation and accidental disclosure.
119.
by bahjoite 10y ago
> I see nothing wrong in using same public key to log in from a particular machine to a number of remote machines. There is nothing really wrong with it; it's a good way to reduce the burden of managing secrets. The downside though
120.
by bahjoite 10y ago
At the bottom of the gag order is states that OWS "may disclose the attached subpoena to an attorney for [OWS] for the purpose of receiving legal advice".

More ›