Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
badfrog
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
64 ms
·
271.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
I think Facebook's "bunny" system is also open source, but I have no idea how easy it is to set up.
272.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
My understanding of the first concern was that users are in trouble if GoLinks shuts down or has an outage. Do you have any mitigation plan for such cases?
273.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> Instagram provides that illusion by not injecting opinionated content into your feed (The most obvious example: you aren't seeing injected news stories in your Instagram feed, generally its only ads and people you follow, and the
274.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> Netflix (as TV) provides some healthy entertainment. It's far from obvious that TV is healthy. This article has some discussion of one potential downside and a rebuttal: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article&#
275.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
Yeah, it kind of implies that you should spend 100% of your waking time being "productive", which is not realistic. Everybody needs time to recharge, and depending on your personality, that can be anything from going to a bar with
276.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> The only reason why you get away with all of this is because it is so difficult to put an actual number on those. It's equally difficult to put numbers on the positive effects, which can be anything from enjoying a joke to organiz
277.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
Indeed. You can be wrong without lying.
278.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> Even on a simple calculator. Why not? If they're paying people to build this software, they presumably want to make it good. With this data, they can learn all kinds of things to help improve future versions: when/why is it c
279.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> But how does it change anything related to how bad the product is From OP: > I hear real change from leadership > Fb has invested hugely in protecting elections, possibly more than any single government. They have doubled that on
280.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> This argument sounds a lot like gaslighting. That's just a matter of whether you think OP truly believes what they said.
281.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> the main piece of them criticism is that perhaps users shouldn't be trusted with a permission this broad (which had already been fixed 4 years earlier). Agreed. This broad permission was also widely known well before CA. IMO the o
282.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
What's the relation?
283.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
If you click through to the original PI investigation [1], it says: > Facebook routinely tracks users, non-users and logged-out users outside its platform through Facebook Business Tools. App developers share data with Facebook through
284.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> They typically try to bypass security/privacy teams to avoid the hassle of dealing with them. The PMs I worked with at FB definitely wouldn't do that. Having those teams find a problem after you've built a feature is muc
285.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
Basically the same. My reasons for leaving were not related to company/product ethics.
286.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> What you see there is that everyone is trying to maximize their TC (Total Comp). For most people, that's the only goal. The whole "Let's make the world a better place" is something that was sold by PR people. Face
287.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
I worked at FB for three years as a software engineer. The people I worked with basically believed: 1) The core product is good and useful to people/society 2) Most of the negative articles about Facebook are based on some piece of tru
288.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
FWIW, I found very little overlap between the opinions that were popular on blind and the opinions of my colleagues who opened up to me. The people who become active Blind users are the ones who are already frustrated and want to complain l
289.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
It's easy to object to something you can't do. I'm sure there's a decent amount of people who would maintain their objections, but many others would "evolve their values" when such behavior became possible and
290.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
This just means that people who already know your phone number and are already your Facebook friend will see your profile if they search for your phone number. That seems pretty harmless to me.
291.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> Right across the Internet? Very few, I imagine! Mainly because they don't have the resources to do it.
292.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
> But why the F... would my bank want to notify FB that I am using their app? It's not that they want to notify Facebook. It's that they get useful functionality from libraries that Facebook makes available. And they've ei
293.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
What are the benefits of that?
294.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
It's definitely a thing in the US. 64% of the population lived in urban areas in 1950 compared to 81% in 2010. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urbanization_in_the_United_Sta...
295.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
That's it! I had forgotten the name.
296.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
What's the distinction between addiction and just enjoying something? Is there evidence that Facebook use is the former?
297.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
Do those blacklists break any functionality on these apps?
298.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
Makes sense, thanks for answering!
299.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
And because a much larger percentage of those people want to live in big cities compared to 50 years ago.
300.
▲
by
badfrog
8y ago
I'm curious why you torrent music still when streaming is so widely available and free/cheap? I did a lot of torrenting back in the 2000s, but thinking back on it I spent a ton of time finding things, organizing my file system, tr
More ›