Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
bad_user
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
211.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
The biggest reason, as I see it, is that the web is a free market, whereas on Android's and iOS's app stores you're beholden to Google's and Apple's taxes, restrictions and whims. The second reason is the resources
212.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
Google pays Apple billions in their search deal, per year ($18 billion in 2021). Apple may sell devices, but it's safe to say that at this point Google entirely funds Safari. Apple is unwilling to upset that cash cow without risking th
213.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
> "Privacy Firefox is the only major browser not built by a company that makes money from advertising" This is BS. Firefox is funded entirely by Google's Ads. Even if you donate to Mozilla, those donations won't be
214.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
Fair use is intended for humans, much like copyright in general. If you can't copyright AI-generated pieces, then why would fair use apply to LLMs?
215.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
> the greatest threat to free software is the proliferation of non-copyleft free software which can be closed down if a company so wishes. That's BS. First of all, companies have closed down GPL projects, because founding companie
216.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
I agree. And for this reason I also think that people show hypocrisy when blocking ads on YouTube, saying that they support creators via other channels. Because everyone cares about price, and supporting creators individually gets expensive
217.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
How much are Google or Apple spending on developing Chrome and Safari? And note that they also develop the operating systems (Android, ChromeOS, iOS, macOS), so have an integration advantage from it.
218.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
Not sure what “userspace emulators” you're speaking of, but the apps I tried, for running a programming language (for education purposes) are rubbish due to limitations (you can only interpret, you can't compile). And the restrict
219.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
That article actually shows that Mozilla spends most on software development. It does have a lot of administrative overhead that it could do without, instead of laying off engineers, like they did. But the article itself is trash, due to co
220.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
I think this trend favours unpopular languages. ChatGPT can only provide answers for programming languages and libraries that were included in its training. Granted, unpopular programming languages have online activity, too, but sample size
221.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
You could get extensions working on FF for Android, for some time now, by setting a custom collection ID, allowed in the Beta version. The problem is that many extensions have been incompatible with Android. And of those compatible, many ha
222.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
I very much agree with you, however, do you really think that Microsoft, of all companies, isn't using your data for training LLMs, with all the data leakage risks? What makes you think that your data is safer on OneDrive? Bing Chat (b
223.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
The latest Kotlin can target WasmGC. WasmGC became enabled by default, quite recently, in both Chrome and Firefox: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/wasmgc/ Kotlin's support is in Alpha right now, but works w
224.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
WASM, Android, and iOS targeting is subpar, though. For multi-platform client-side targeting, Kotlin is actually more interesting. .NET was always built for showmanship, with somewhat disappointing results when actually tried.
225.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
... for Big Tech. It's how companies like Microsoft or Adobe could grow and gain uncontested monopolies. Because, due to piracy, price was no longer a good enough differentiator. And it's why "Linux on the desktop" never
226.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
Except it's missing the "everything" aspect, payments processing, or the support of the Chinese government.
227.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
That may be true, but if you don't like YouTube, go somewhere else. The argument that it's your machine and you choose what to run on it no longer holds when YouTube clearly no longer wants people with ad blockers as visitors. So
228.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
This isn't actually true. HR people do apply such filters, but you can usually work around it, if you're a capable individual that can actually "stack shift". I "stack shifted" multiple times in my career, with
229.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
If employees would have voted Sam out, you'd take that as a shiny example of the proletariat exercising the power for the good of human kind, hammer, sickle and all that. I always find it funny when people understand democracy to mean
230.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
Non-profit just means there are no stakeholders, meaning that revenue must be used for the organization's expenses, which includes the compensation of employees and growth. Many non-profits also benefit from tax-exemptions. Assuming an
231.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
> Show me a study of a population who eats steaks, vegetables, avoids processed foods, and is athletic and I’ll show you a healthy heart. You're probably right, but only because the actual problem has always been the excess calori
232.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
Indeed. I wrote that post, and I must say, I currently use Firefox, but I have a love-hate relationship with it. I can list many things I dislike about Firefox, and I understand if people don't like it. But overall, yes, it's a go
233.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
I already answered your question in the post you're replying to.
234.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
It's the same Chromium, it can't be more resource-efficient. It did have some tricks, but “energy saver” and “memory saver” modes have been added to Chromium.
235.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
I keep seeing Edge mentioned as a worthy alternative, and I just don't get it. First, all Chromium-based browsers will eventually block uBlock Origin for the sole reason that they can't maintain Manifest v2 on their own, and they
236.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
The universe is not based on math, says math. Math can be viewed as a product of how our minds work. We use abstractions to understand and predict the universe, but it's always imperfect, and the theories always incomplete. E g., you&#
237.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
Math should be patentable, too. I see no reason for why not. The old argument that it's discovered rather than invented is bullshit. Multiple people can always have the same idea for an invention because we think alike and live in the
238.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
It's still parroting what other people did, it's not doing any math reasoning, and it's not any different to LLMs seemingly able to compose prose or poetry. If you want to make an argument that math or software shouldn't
239.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
> " They put all the streams in one pool and then split from there. Popular artists get almost all of it. " Like they should, mostly because they drive Spotify subscriptions. It's fair because there is a strong correlation
240.
▲
by
bad_user
3y ago
I can corroborate this experience. As a teenager in the 90s and a young man in the 00s, I barely bought a couple of original CDs in those decades. Most of the music I had was pirated (downloaded, or recorded from radio). I would fill my har
More ›