bad_user

67 ms·

721.
by bad_user 7y ago
WHO currently represents the scientific consensus. No, they don't tell you what to do, it is your government that does that, or in this case a private entity. But anybody with a brain would go for the scientific consensus. (Even though
722.
by bad_user 7y ago
> " I fear there isn't "one truth" out there, despite the content providers' and fact-checkers' attempts :( " Sorry but there is always just one truth. It might be incomplete, but it's always just
723.
by bad_user 7y ago
Why would they? AFAIK they don't support IMAP/SMTP either, not without that client-side "bridge" anyway.
724.
by bad_user 7y ago
The broken English aspect also happens because we know search engines don't understand English anyway.
725.
by bad_user 7y ago
> " I can still touch type with Qwerty, but my hands hurt after 5 minutes. " That's not a good metric. In your case, you might be right, but for the general public it's like when picking up any new exercise or sport,
726.
by bad_user 7y ago
I never understood why Dvorak is a thing. I and others like me can touch type with Qwerty just fine. I can comfortably do 70-90 wpm, which is above my speed of thought. I don't suffer from RSI either and I've been touch typing for
727.
by bad_user 7y ago
Thanks ´･ᴗ･`
728.
by bad_user 7y ago
Hi, any article on the subject I could read? This is the first time I hear of rEFInd.
729.
by bad_user 7y ago
The problem is that special integration is required. Personally I don't like VS Code, I too use IntelliJ IDEA, which will probably end up having support, but it didn't last time I tried. On my Macbook I also use Emacs and GUI vers
730.
by bad_user 7y ago
I have a MacBook Pro that I wanted to turn into a Windows laptop. Unfortunately if you install Windows from scratch, without going through Bootcamp to install it side by side with MacOS, Hyper-V support is disabled. This means that I cannot
731.
by bad_user 7y ago
> " If there was, why would you waste your time? Either it's not going to be free or it's going to disappear. " Because voting with your wallet works.
732.
by bad_user 7y ago
Before the current prices, they had family plans and the rationale for removing them was that they are struggling to be profitable. So your hutch goes counter to their direct declaration at the time (I'm a long time customer, don'
733.
by bad_user 7y ago
Except everything will get duplicated in Archive ;-)
734.
by bad_user 7y ago
Gmail does not have a mix of labels and folders. It's all labels in Gmail.
735.
by bad_user 7y ago
Would be good to do what Gmail does over IMAP because many email clients already know how to handle it. A feature that only works in the web UI isn't useful for me and while I'm excited about JMAP, it doesn't have support in
736.
by bad_user 7y ago
I've been a Fastmail user for my personal email for several years now, however I still miss labels. Therefore I love seeing this. It is unclear to me how this works with IMAP clients. Are these labels still exposed as folders over IMAP
737.
by bad_user 7y ago
Labels will probably remain optional, since folders are better supported by IMAP clients and they've been in the standard forever. The only service that does not support folders properly is Gmail and the actual problem with Gmail is th
738.
by bad_user 7y ago
Fastmail also provides syncing of contacts via CardDAV [1]. Works great with iOS and MacOS out of the box, never had issues with it. [1]: https://www.fastmail.com/help/technical/servernamesandports....
739.
by bad_user 7y ago
I would argue that's OK. The problem with third-party cookies is that information gets shared across websites and thus your behavior can be tracked across websites. If you set a CNAME to point to a third-party, the cookies become in fa
740.
by bad_user 7y ago
I disagree, Google Hangouts was a failure from the start. Former Google Talk supported XMMP, including federation, which meant you could connect with multiple clients and talk with people talk with people that don't have Google account
741.
by bad_user 7y ago
> " The correct proposition instead would be to stop analytics on your website, period. " Analytics are for optimizing your business and presentation, for finding out how big your audience is, how it responds to new content or
742.
by bad_user 7y ago
Rust isn't very FP, even if working with a borrow checker limits sharing, thus approaching the problem from a different angle, but with similar results as referential transparency. And TypeScript doesn't have much in common with O
743.
by bad_user 7y ago
No, it is the scientists that have predicted the disaster, with an overwhelming consensus, hence the downvotes.
744.
by bad_user 7y ago
Firefox and Safari. Safari may be proprietary, but its engine remains OSS and you could fork it, which is what Google did. That said I'm a happy Firefox user.
745.
by bad_user 7y ago
While I agree with the general feelings about the evil threshold, Microsoft in the 90-ties built and took advantage of a natural monopoly in order to crush their competition and expand in new markets. Let's not go to the other extreme
746.
by bad_user 7y ago
It's probably against their ToS and Google could detect it and ban all of those accounts, or the servers' IPs. You can then keep fooling them by creating new accounts or changing IPs (assuming your usage doesn't have clear pa
747.
by bad_user 7y ago
Zoom also claims to have end-to-end encryption and yet they don't, their marketing and even their clarification post being a lie. Companies like Zoom can claim that they are GDPR compliant however truth of the matter is that compliance
748.
by bad_user 7y ago
No, that's not a clarification. What the TFA is saying is that the decryption key is generated by their servers and even passed through China, even if none of the people in the conversation are in China. That's NOT end-to-end encr
749.
by bad_user 7y ago
I don't understand you. Being from Romania, in all the companies I worked on, we had the need to communicate online by voice and video (mostly with Americans and among ourselves), plus I tended to work in companies with a remote cultur
750.
by bad_user 7y ago
Zoom is lying in their marketing AND in their recent clarification. As the article is saying, they always have the decryption key on the server side, so they always have the capability to decrypt the stream. Given the current state of affai

More ›