back_to_basics

2 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by back_to_basics 10mo ago

   "As always, it's the intent that matters." That's certainly not a universal Legal Standard. If I'm harmed, but you didn't "intend" to harm me, does that nullify my Claim? Hardly.
2. 2.▲
   by back_to_basics 10mo ago

   A gross mischaracterization, really. 1. Said "consumer" is effectively hoarding Supply, and thus distorting the Market. 2. Said "consumer" has no effective means to either Deploy nor Utilize said products as neither the
3. 3.▲
   by back_to_basics 11mo ago

   While it's certainly worthwhile to discuss the Technical and Procedural elements that contributed to this Service Outage, the far more important (and mutually-exclusive aspect) to discuss should be: Why have we built / permitted t
4. 4.▲
   by back_to_basics 2y ago

   "human programmers forget to account for edge cases" Which is precisely the rationale which led to Standard Operating Procedures and Best Practices (much like any other Sector of business has developed). I submit to you, respectfu