babyrainbow

10 ms·

61.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
>It feels like they are able to launch rockets into space every.. Not it doesn't. Stop trying to spread false impressions. This site is a discussion platform, not an advertising one...
62.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
> their toxic communications If you can't handle the truth, then every truhful communication can be "toxic" to you.
63.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14633446
64.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
Exactly this. Funny that very few people see this and instead are already cheering them for doing the "impossible"...
65.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
There seems to be a reason that more companies are not attempting to reuse rockets [1] So considering that, SpaceX has not proved anything, yet. Because the impossible or hard part is not launching and landing rockets. Hard part is to do it
66.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
Another central concept that says "Everything is Maya", hints at the idea that there is no absolute reality, and is very close to the simulation hypothesis.. Another one is the concept of 'Omkaaram' which is supposed to
67.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
Wanna be my bot?
68.
Why doesn't more space companies try to reuse thier rockets?(quora.com)
2 points by babyrainbow 9y ago|2 comments
69.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
>Can you point me to any other company which has landed a rocket after putting a payload in orbit? Because if they aren't deploying payloads, they aren't competing with SpaceX. Alright then. It might be true no one else had do
70.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
But everyone is acting like that. I mean, isn't it the oldest trick in the pr/advertisement process. To create an impression without actually claiming anything. Interesting.
71.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
> That sort of tracking is much easier if you don't need to resuse the hardware afterwards. Says who? Your tracking is either precise or it is not. What you are using the precision for is immaterial in this regard.. >anyone else
72.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
> I mean they're only the only company among all companies and/or nation states with launch capabilities who have ever done it in the history of space travel. That assumes all of them were trying to do it all this time, and wer
73.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
or may be people are realizing that this was not really a big deal in the first place.....
74.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
>We're getting better at reducing our impact environmentally. We are getting better at reducing our environmental impact from tech that have been in use for decades. And that too after decades of negligence and denial. But we are st
75.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
> ultimately better life for us all (such as antibiotics). Yes. A number of generations had a good life. But what about the coming generations. What does the "progress at any cost", have in store for them? All things considered
76.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
I think the idea is that the key to being regarded honorably is to be really good at what you claim you do. And a life time is only long enough to master, i mean, really master, a single thing. I think it must be a totally alien, or even
77.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
Ha! I had the exact opposite. I used DDG a while when it was introduced. But returned back to google since the results were no as good. But recently I was feeling googles results has got a lot worse and gave DDG another try. Big difference!
78.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
>Elon Musk is not known for vaporware or BSing... Hyperloop though.. I mean, I think bullshit can be sold to even 'techies' aka HN crowd, if it is wrapped just the right way...
79.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
I am not sure why this tech is acceptable, at all. People fall asleep even while actively driving the car. How can they be expected to maintain vigil with something like this. But I guess Tesla is content with ending their responsibility at
80.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
>If we're going to bother questioning trends, shouldn't we be aiming to be questioning in a way that is different from everyone else who has questioned before us? That would be nice. > it would appear that previous questioni
81.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
> I'm not sure why so many people perpetually can't wrap their head around it. The really question is, should we (as thoughtful human being as we consider ourselves to be) bother to question the trend (Which you are surprised
82.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
> The two tasks aren't very similar.. Care to elaborate? Is folding laundry harder than driving? Doesn't both involve following visual cues and making corrections continuously based on that... >It's a pithy put-down if
83.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
People are downvoting you. But I think this is a really good point...
84.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
>Removing the effects without redoing the timeline would be able to measure some effects, but not others. Like what exactly? >Yes you have a technically correct point, but the way you went about presenting it as "this argument is
85.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
> Once you change something, like vaccine vs. no vaccine, there is a chance that the "twin earth" or "your version who never had shots" comes out completely differently for essentially random reasons.... There is no n
86.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
>I'm lumping that in under "studies" about health effects. Then the blame is on you, Not me.
87.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
>That studies don't have literally the same people in both groups... Go back to my first comment and tell me where I mention any kind of studies. All I was point was at the logical fallacy in the claim that something hadn't any
88.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
What stupid pedantic point? Go back to my first comment and read carefully. Tell me what I am saying, and tell what is stupid about it..
89.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
He he. It is really funny how people are reacting when they come across things with huge emotional investment and even remotely questioning of their beliefs... I ask . "Is it logical to reach the conclusion x based on y " and peo
90.
by babyrainbow 9y ago
Exactly! You can't. You get the idea. But with pants, I guess you never had to wonder "Is wearing pants safe".

More ›