3 ms·
> Once you change something, like vaccine vs. no vaccine, there is a chance that the "twin earth" or "your version who never had shots" comes out completely dif
by babyrainbow 9y ago
> Once you change something, like vaccine vs. no vaccine, there is a chance that the "twin earth" or "your version who never had shots" comes out completely differently for essentially random reasons....
There is no need to use a time line. You can have an hypothetical machine that could extract the effects of the vaccine from your body... So you enter into this machine, and comes out as a version that never had any vaccines...There. You have got your delta.
- Dylan16807 9y agoRemoving the effects without redoing the timeline would be able to measure some effects, but not others. Anyway this is not really helpful so I'll restate the part that actually matters and then peace out. Yes you have a technically correct point, but the way you went about presenting it as "this argument is flawed" lead to people pointing out significantly more important flaws in the argument. You then sassed people instead of just letting it be or trying to refocus on what you were actually trying to contribute. Not a great strategy, all-in-all.
- babyrainbow 9y ago>Removing the effects without redoing the timeline would be able to measure some effects, but not others. Like what exactly? >Yes you have a technically correct point, but the way you went about presenting it as "this argument is flawed if "argument is flawed" how can I present it any different...