azth

31 ms·

241.
by azth 5y ago
Our actions and what we are allowed to do are constrained by God's orders. He owns us, and defines what we are and are not allowed to engage in. It is a consistent and non-contradicting system, unlike the liberal atheist view where the
242.
by azth 5y ago
That's terrible. Stay safe.
243.
by azth 5y ago
Cheers
244.
Creating Virtual Threads with Java's Project Loom(davidvlijmincx.com)
3 points by azth 5y ago|0 comments
245.
by azth 5y ago
If you can't decide what's right from wrong, why ask? It means that you have no way of telling whether anything is right or wrong. Is murder wrong? Is stealing wrong? Is interest wrong? We don't know I suppose eh?
246.
by azth 5y ago
So your question doesn't make sense, right?
247.
by azth 5y ago
Define "opposition". In any case, God forbids homosexual relationships. Whether the harms of such relationships are apparent to us or not is secondary.
248.
by azth 5y ago
Try Avocado oil, it's supposed to have a high smoke point.
249.
by azth 5y ago
Great to hear :) Keep us posted.
250.
by azth 5y ago
Exactly. Haven't people learned from what's literally happening right now? Why wouldn't China taking over Taiwan be next if they see what's happening?
251.
by azth 5y ago
By making a website for homosexuals, she is aiding them to engage in a sinful activity. It's really quite straightforward logical behavior. And from Christianity's perspective (as well as many other faiths), this is not a "fa
252.
by azth 5y ago
It's not illegal to refuse to do business with someone. It's quite ironic how keeping morality is now somehow a "fringe" action, but not spreading sexual immorality.
253.
by azth 5y ago
That's not me. I suggest you remove that link from your comment as you're doxxing people. I'll be reporting your post.
254.
by azth 5y ago
Hope you stay safe.
255.
by azth 5y ago
Real world programs say otherwise.
256.
by azth 5y ago
Calling unsafe is not the point here. You can do similar things in Java if you really need to.
257.
by azth 5y ago
There's no reason to have to write overly abstract code in Java. Modern Java has many features that let you write even more clear code (e.g. interfaces with default methods). Even things like mocking, you don't need to write a ded
258.
by azth 5y ago
"Enterprise code" can be written in any language. My employer invented an entire web framework in golang and we routinely see stack traces up to 80 lines or more even. A lot of the need to write such a framework was from golang&#x
259.
by azth 5y ago
I have, and it proves my argument. Limbo went nowhere when it was developed under AT&T for example.
260.
by azth 5y ago
Not a joke. Large real world programs are proof (otherwise, my employer will not be spending millions of dollars on reinventing performance and other toolings already present in the JVM). What golang gui programs are you comparing against?
261.
by azth 5y ago
I'm pointing out the inconsistencies of the liberal ideology.
262.
by azth 5y ago
There's a balance. Reading golang code is very burdensome because the reader has to read many lines of code which can amount to nothing more than a map/filter/reduce, and those are littered everywhere. Same with error handlin
263.
by azth 5y ago
You can stop with the odhominem
264.
by azth 5y ago
In that case, Python is also a "systems language", but you don't see people claiming it as such.
265.
by azth 5y ago
I've used both in production settings, a sympathetic perspective doesn't help :)
266.
by azth 5y ago
A tradeoff in what exactly?
267.
by azth 5y ago
golang is not marginally faster than Java however in the real world.
268.
by azth 5y ago
The philosophy behind Java is that a feature needs to be demonstrated in production very well before it is added to the language, in order no to go overboard with features and end up with C++ :) Value types have proven their worth, especial
269.
by azth 5y ago
The point is, pointer dereferencing in golang is limited to mimicing value types/reference types, something that C# already offers. It is not like C and C++ where you have pointer arithmetic. So it's just an illusion that it is &q
270.
by azth 5y ago
How do you decide what's right?

More ›