azborder

4 ms·

1.
by azborder 8y ago
“Hate speech” seems to cover a pretty wide spectrum these days.
2.
by azborder 8y ago
It sounds like you’re advocating stretching the definition of the term to support your own bias, when it has a pretty clear meaning.
3.
by azborder 8y ago
Are you saying we shouldn’t discuss an archaeological find because it makes a part of one civilization look bad? That kind of anti-science thinking is dangerous.
4.
by azborder 8y ago
That entire review is ridiculous. So much bias and selective use of historical information to suit the writer’s opinion.
5.
by azborder 8y ago
The only thing stopping it in the US is the equal credit act. Most of these “novel” credit scoring solutions are just attempts to work around the race and other prohibitions in credit scoring. The good news is that these things get shut dow
6.
by azborder 8y ago
All of these reports take into account the intoxication of any parties involved. Not sure why it’s unfair to point out that the person illegally in the road was in a state that contributed to the accident. It’s not like she was just standin
7.
by azborder 8y ago
Harassment? The guy was a drug dealer with a lot of drugs in his car, and they tried to ask him if they could search his car. I’d say that’s about as far from harassment as it gets.
8.
by azborder 8y ago
Interesting because the site has multiple references for its statements and you have none.
9.
by azborder 8y ago
It’s probably a case of finally having a complete chain from detection to action for smaller non-aircraft crossings. There have already been government cameras in place along the smuggling routes, and you can even watch some amateur hidden