azangru

29 ms·

451.
by azangru 3y ago
> The biggest level up someone can get is learning how to communicate and write well. I am not sure it is so generalisable. For example, between learning how to code and learning how to communicate and write well, I do not know which wou
452.
by azangru 3y ago
> I was expecting this to be a rant against Uncle Bob for his weird comments around the fake women speakers at the tech conference. It would have been very unfortunate if it were. If an article, entitled "Goodbye, Clean Code",
453.
by azangru 3y ago
> Web Developers shouldn't need to "support" particular browsers at all, that's what standards are for. I agree. But different standards get adopted by different browsers at different rates. Case in point: Firefox sti
454.
by azangru 3y ago
> How would it work if it wouldn't? He explains what he means by that. If you spend time and resources on all things the users require and your run out of money and go out of business, everybody loses. I think there is also a bit of
455.
by azangru 3y ago
I think what I am seeing in this article is a curious mixture of should and does . For example, the "user > dev" formula is a clear example of "should"; but when he gets to "biz > user", he surreptitio
456.
by azangru 3y ago
> a working example that you don't understand and just copy over and over again into new projects. Once you have a working example, you can go through it line by line and figure out what it is doing.
457.
by azangru 3y ago
> a better alternative Deno?
458.
by azangru 3y ago
And for development?
459.
by azangru 3y ago
> The TS approach of "please at least annotate all your function signatures" The whole signature or just the parameters? I thought typescript is pretty chill about inferring the return type on its own.
460.
by azangru 3y ago
> Find a professional front-end developer who is willing to use simple HTML, JS & CSS and I'd agree with you. > It's almost impossible. The first reaction is always `npm init` Consider a simple case — a static website co
461.
by azangru 3y ago
I've skimmed through Ayaan's essay linked in the post, and, as is always the case with such arguments, found it frustratingly unsatisfying. She seems to be talking about her political position, her allegiance to a particular tribe
462.
by azangru 3y ago
In other words, return to web development practices from the early 2000s? Isn't this just the pendulum swinging the other way? Haven't there been genuine problems with that style of authoring websites that the last twenty years in
463.
by azangru 3y ago
See "coordinate adjectives" vs "non-coordinate adjectives".
464.
by azangru 3y ago
> You have made a bold statement Not me, sorry :-)
465.
by azangru 3y ago
> "intelligentsia" is not intelectuals, it just means secret police . There are dictionaries online, you know? You could even type "define intelligentsia" into the Google search box, and get a decent answer.
466.
by azangru 3y ago
But doesn't doing X for 1 month make you a charlatan? For example, consider you only did frontend/ui/ux for one month. How much rubbish you would pick up over that time by googling for tutorials or watching youtube videos to
467.
by azangru 3y ago
> What is so hard that people find estimating their work? Unpredictability for any new work. Even knowing my codebase well, I sometimes forget how changing some piece of code will require changes in other places. And without having done
468.
by azangru 3y ago
I've always used Twitter in read-only mode; but shortly before the Muskover, Twitter, probably in a desperate attempt to increase the number of its active users, became quite hostile to non-logged-in readers like me; and this has only
469.
by azangru 3y ago
I suppose the phrase "react app" is there in the title just for SEO purposes. What it should have said is "how to dockerize an nginx instance" ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
470.
by azangru 3y ago
- Why is a company equated with one product? - Without a "product manager", or, since I prefer scrum terminology, "product owner", who determines the direction of the product development? Who decides what the
471.
by azangru 3y ago
> I then searched "best mac text editors for writing" If you change "for writing" to "for writers", you would get more appropriate results from Google.
472.
by azangru 3y ago
> No, but neither does it work outside of DOM. I know. This thread was specifically about the web though. Web components? If you put React on the web, it is only fair to consider it together with react-dom in all the comparisons. Without
473.
by azangru 3y ago
> This is factually incorrect. React is 6.4kB minified. What you are talking about is a bundle of React and ReactDOM. If you look at my comment again, you may notice that I wrote "react-dom". I checked before writing. > If
474.
by azangru 3y ago
> I’d be afraid to choose a library created by Google I wouldn't :-) Lit is just a tiny wrapper over native web components to add reactivity to their behaviour; but what is more important, Lit positions itself as a gradually disappe
475.
by azangru 3y ago
> React is not an equivalent of Web Components, but neither it is another web framework. What it is is a tiny and very general reactive GUI library. As for tiny, react-dom currently stands at 42kb minified gzipped. A tiny library would b
476.
by azangru 3y ago
> The downside to web components here is that they can only be run on the client, for all intents and purposes. There's no way to pass server-rendered shadow dom content on the server to the client, so even if your web component is
477.
by azangru 3y ago
> Ah wait no, you mean the new ones that virtually no one uses, right? This is exactly the point. Virtually no-one is using them (well, except for Microsoft, and Google, and Adobe, and Github, and Reddit, and NordHealth, and a bunch of o
478.
by azangru 3y ago
Maybe I am missing something, but how would mdx work? Mdx requires a jsx runtime, plus components written in jsx. How would the writing tool know which runtime/framework to use for jsx components, and where to pull jsx components from?
479.
by azangru 3y ago
> The semantic version is smaller because it utilizes high-level, semantic components like .nav What is the purpose of writing <nav class=".nav"> if you can just write <nav>? There seems to be only one navigation el
480.
by azangru 3y ago
> that description is what happens when programmers do marketing To me, this statement implies that developers of Lexical would be interested in maximizing their user base, as opposed to, say, attracting the right kind of users.

More ›