ayush_xeneva

4 ms·

1.
by ayush_xeneva 7mo ago
We are building XenevaOS because we’re tired of seeing XR hardware held back by mobile-first operating systems. Android is great for phones, but the overhead and the non-deterministic nature of any other scheduler make it a struggle for low
2.
by ayush_xeneva 7mo ago
The attached link is for our waitlist, you can check the codebase here : https://github.com/manaskamal/XenevaOS
3.
Show HN: We wrote a custom microkernel for XR because Android felt too bloated(explorexenevaos.vercel.app)
3 points by ayush_xeneva 7mo ago|3 comments
4.
Show HN: Launching Our XR-Native Operating System(explore.getxeneva.com)
1 points by ayush_xeneva 7mo ago|1 comments
5.
by ayush_xeneva 7mo ago
Interesting, noted. Here's our repo btw - https://github.com/manaskamal/XenevaOS
6.
Ask HN: Use-Cases for an Operating System with a Custom Kernel
1 points by ayush_xeneva 7mo ago|3 comments
7.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Targeting everything has indeed been a workload but we're trying to do the best we can! The project was initially just on x86 and we ported it to ARM in the last 3-4 months. The time it took us to port it on ARM was a fraction of what
8.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
We're doing research on some new way of handling things, like why always "Everything is a file?" "The Philosophy on Unix" and other approach can be taken with optimization on mind. Figuring out the best possible way
9.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Agreed.
10.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Speaking of hardware, we're targeting SOCs like Rockchip, Raspberry Pi 3,4 and Qualcomm Snapdragon Chips. It currently doesn't support any open standard but we're targeting OpenXR standard and also some native way of applicat
11.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
We get what you're saying. The claims that we're making do indeed seem like just claims for now but we're actively working on real life benchmarks in comparison to industry standards. Stay tuned for our Public Beta/Proto
12.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Thank you for your comment and we agree that saying "we’re removing legacy baggage" is more like a blank marketing statement if not backed by any real technical answers but yes, the reason for that happening is due to the state of
13.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
We're building completely bottoms up!
14.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
We totally agree with you and accordingly, we've thought things through! We do have appropriate strategies to handle challenges but once again, they're quite challenging! We would've loved to mention how exactly we plan to de
15.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Thank you for your comment and yes we totally get the things that you've mentioned. We're well prepared and ready to tackle a possible "perpetual development hell" and are also aware about the issues with closed source S
16.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Thank you for your comment and we love your take on this! Coming to what we think about John Carmack's arguments against building a custom XR OS at Meta, It's kinda hard to have a single answer for this but we like to think that t
17.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
We've looked closely into MentraOS and respect them for what they're doing! We see that they're funded by YC and are doing great but although both Team Xeneva & Team Mentra operate in similar fields, both of our ventures
18.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
We do mean AI being as an OS Functionality, although this has a long way to go and we transparently admit that we're still in initial stages. One of the primary use cases or functionality for AI integration would be for app development
19.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Thank you for your comment and yes, totally from scratch! You can look at our GitHub commit history to get a hint of how we were able to implement all of this.
20.
Show HN: An Open Source XR(AR/VR) Operating System(getxeneva.com)
38 points by ayush_xeneva 1y ago|28 comments
21.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Your comment is acknowledged. Thank you, Team Xeneva.
22.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Thank you so much for your comment ! If you're interested, you can have a look at our website, getxeneva.com to learn more! Team XENEVA.
23.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Hello, thanks for your comment. Xeneva is built from scratch with modern hardware and modern computing on mind. We're working on making a transitional shift from legacy systems. You can refer to our website, getxeneva.com to get a hint
24.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Hello, MSVC seems quite interesting for us. No doubt, the code can be ported to other build environment. For instance, The ARM64 version uses both the advantages of clang and MSVC. The build setup is not so hard, and once setup is complete
25.
by ayush_xeneva 1y ago
Hello, thank you for reaching out! Yes, the GitHub repository has limited information currently, but we are working on the documentations. - Xeneva is not intending to be Unix like, but some core principles of Unix are followed. - Xeneva ha