ay

31 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by ay 11y ago

   You can go to http://testipv6.com/ and check for yourself. Indeed, 1 out of 5 users in USA today has IPv6.
2. 272.▲
   by ay 11y ago

   Indeed, finding nerds on ello is a bit tricky, and as you say some of them went silent after trying it initially. Amongst my friends https://ello.co/danyork has been impressively insistent in using it, but that's among
3. 273.▲
   by ay 11y ago

   re. 6to4: agreed, and never will, see https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7526 re NAT64: not so agreed... 1. T-Mobile USA: they have few millions of IPv6-only subscribers using 464XLAT which has NAT64 as a component. 2. Sta
4. 274.▲
   by ay 11y ago

   There will be no abrupt end. Just the price per IP will slowly grow, and the usefulness of this IP will slowly fade. There's no panic. The trick with IPv6 deployment is predicting two years in advance the moment will you need IPv6 &quo
5. 275.▲
   by ay 11y ago

   Exactly. And as the home speeds reach 1Gbps to the home, there will not be enough CGN boxes that will be able to sustain that load, so one of the two options: 1) more stateless mechanisms will be used (lw4o6, MAP) - which do not give the en
6. 276.▲
   by ay 11y ago

   No, no no no. 6to4 as a mechanism is the worst mistreatment you can do to your users because of the way it works with asymmetric traffic paths traversing the gateways you can not control. I think what you meant to post was this: https:&#x2
7. 277.▲
   by ay 11y ago

   $250M for a /8 (2^24) is almost $15 per address, which is 35% higher than the recent public deal [1] (though in RIPE address space), so maybe the time of $16 per IP did not come yet ;-). I guess you've seen that at least in RIPE t
8. 278.▲
   by ay 11y ago

   The most widely known is Azure, when they had to shuffle addresses around: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2014/06/ipv4-e... Google already started charging a nominal fee for idle IPv4 addr
9. 279.▲
   by ay 11y ago

   There are multiple RIRs who exhausted in various times. RIPE already ran on the "1024 addresses for every new member and that's it" soft-landing policy for the past couple of years. But ARIN does not have a nice policy like R
10. 280.▲
    by ay 11y ago

    Hmm, you have an IPv4 /8 that you don't need that you want to sell ? I'm sure with ARIN running out probably tomorrow there would surely be interest soon!
11. 281.▲
    by ay 11y ago

    I tested Skype back in January on IPv6only+NAT64, worked for me. Anyway given this: http://www.internetsociety.org/deploy360/blog/2015/06/apple-... , the days of "Apps not working with IPv6" are
12. 282.▲
    by ay 11y ago

    IP options were not an option, unfortunately. One of the many studies: http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2005/EECS-2005-24...
13. 283.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    What about trusting not the key itself, but the CA which signed the cert - whose cert came within the cert chain upplied by the server ? Then everyone could get their own "root" CA and renew the certificates to their heart's
14. 284.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    http://slice.mit.edu/2013/11/05/wristify-thermal-comfort-via... and http://www.embrlabs.com/ ?
15. 285.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    I've sent the software download link in the other comment - so far the history shows quite regular software updates for this box. But I share your concern and can not say much about this box besides what I can infer from the software p
16. 286.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    It's a normal checkbox in the gui "Enable SSH" / "Enable telnet", so I would suppose it is. But further tinkering revealed it seems to be a quite-close approximation of IOS, but not the same IOS you'd get
17. 287.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    Thanks for the link! Is it fanless too ? the 15W consumption seems to hint it could be, but the datasheet does not mention it.
18. 288.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    I've the exact same needs, and by occasion got hold of cisco SG300-10 switch, which I think fits the description - so I thought to share my experience, in case it is useful. I use it for the home lab, where I have a one-armed router se
19. 289.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    Build a custom LiveISO. There are plenty of tutorials, but it is boring to follow them manually, especially if you need to make a couple of tweaks to ISO or update it. So I put together a couple of scripts to automate the process: https:&#
20. 290.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    https://iqtainment.wordpress.com/acoustic-ruler/ I've played with it - with some calibration, it seems to work. But YMMV, and I got it mostly just in an appreciation of the author's clever idea.
21. 291.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    Okay, if there is a jitter on individual pings, it is certainly not the PMTUD-related - and if there is no packet loss, then it is shaping - either intentional, or some middlebox can't cope with the load. When using AICCU (sixxs) - wer
22. 292.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    Thanks, I missed this addition! So there are even two moving targets - the LEDs' lower wavelength and different humans' higher wavelength.
23. 293.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    The thread at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8210878 (assuming StavrosK was not lying like one of the comments suggested), shows an interesting discrepancy in the vision of different people.
24. 294.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    Okay then I think we were in violent agreement. I was arguing the whole "listen on all interfaces by default" is wrong - if one needs to expose the app, they should do so explicitly, and you did the same.
25. 295.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    Once the critical mass is reachable over IPv6, the rest becomes "long-tail" which will eventually be too expensive to bother about. An extreme example: if an internet user has IPv6 and just uses gmail, youtube and facebook - they
26. 296.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    Voo is doing IPv6 as well, AFAIK. http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/ gives a per-AS breakout, with the %%% being the massaged number as seen by the content-provider participants.
27. 297.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    If you install MySQL locally, you should not have it listen on any address other than the loopback by default. And when you do expose it, if you care about security, you should configure the appropriate iptables along the way there and then
28. 298.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    Also, if you are using T-mobile, you can use IPv6-only, and they have a few million subscribers. I got a T-mobile SIM when I was in the US last month, and switched to IPv6-only APN. Worked pretty well for the casual browsing - and the non-I
29. 299.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    The presentation is from... long time ago :-) Now they serve to everyone over IPv4 and IPv6 and these stats are the actual IPv4 requests vs. IPv6 requests that they get, not some projected number. On address selection: Safari uses Apple API
30. 300.▲
    by ay 12y ago

    This description might also match a partly-working path MTU discovery (a possibly too-high rate of ICMP egress from HE end to content sites, blocked by rate-limiter on the HE device). In IPv4 you do not notice it (it almost never triggers)