Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
avs733
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
30 ms
·
391.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
> the bad news for those who contend that the recent leak of a draft Supreme Court opinion is “unthinkable” or, in the words of Chief Justice Roberts, a “singular and egregious breach”—the horse is long out of the barn. I mean…people k
392.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
I have heard the same...but I honestly think that is a 'here lets not try' more so than a 'we wouldn't make use of it'. Totally agree with you on the rest. What is interesting is the admins now finding that those sa
393.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
just for those less familiar, it may be useful to note that the shift towards federal funds is typically linked to decreases in local funding for higher education. It isn't 'organic' there has been an outside forcing function
394.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
they should only collect it themselves amiright? This was the least expensive and most responsible way to conduct this study. What alternative would you provide? Just not doing it?
395.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
I'm left feeling like the headline, its submission here, and a lot of the discussion is more about propaganda than a serious discussion of the merits of this type of research.
396.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
> The CDC wants a say in how people live their lives and thinks they know better than individuals about risk tolerance and decisions. Would you like me to show this to my friends who work at the CDC and record their reactions for you? Oh
397.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
This is an early draft version of the analysis... https://peer.asee.org/engineering-students-misuse-of-busines...
398.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
I don't know, we didn't ask that.
399.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
these are great!...until we scratch the surface and realize each of these can be done incredibly well or incredibly poorly. There is an enormous amount of implicit knowledge in them. And when knowledge is left implicit in instructions, it g
400.
▲
by
avs733
4y ago
My lab has research data that engineering students who are nearing the end of their BS degree and are enrolled in entrepreneurship minors and certificates who cannot differentiate between revenue and profit. What is really interesting is
401.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
What matters isn’t the size of the gap, what matters is the size of the gap relative to the size of the gap it was designed for. If I design a 10” Diam part to be assembled to another with a .001” gap, then a .010 gap is huge. If it’s a 1
402.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
Appreciate that this can be a reasonable conversation. It’s important to note that there is a significant portion of the people employing this term in bad faith who are doing now intentionally and to cause confusion. The problem with a new
403.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
he tried to 'cancel' him by calling him a pedophile. There are varying definitions of 'censorship' floated in this thread. A lot of people in this thread who are defenders of Musk are willing to apply the label censorshi
404.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
I'm not missing the heart of anything. If you want to talk about free speech, talk about free speech. If you want to talk about the first amendment, talk about the first amendment. If you want to talk about something else - label and d
405.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
Twitter is not the government. They are a corporation. Anything they choose to censor (or not) is perfectly in line with the first amendment.
406.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
Yeah but he’s rich so we are compelled to take him at his word
407.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
There are nicely cataloged lists elsewhere in this thread for you to no true Scotsman I for one, if you made me pick an example, would point to his treatment of Vernon Unsworth.
408.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
Part of that legitimate discussion would necessarily include whether people are using abusing the term. The fact that real things happen doesn’t make using the same term to describe not real things happening acceptable. I can’t call out of
409.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
You just described it? The problem, as usual, being that you are trying to describe something with a term where the common usage is just plain bad faith. Unfairly attacked? Harassed? There’s lots of words…the common usage of cancelling is n
410.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
It’s always nice when the counterpoint speaks for itself
411.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
>"Cancelling" is not a good thing when it's done by a mob of knee-jerk reactionaries with the attention span of a fruit fly. canceling is a label applied to play the victim when people are being held accountable for thin
412.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
The fact that the comment you are responding to seems to represent a mainstream and legitimized perception of twitter and the broader concept of free speech gives me zero confidence that we are headed towards more free speech. I'm cons
413.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
the innate value of Twitter is that it is open to the public and the interaction basically drives (sadly) a lot of public discourse. Look at the trump presidency for just...rife examples of this but the phenomenon occurred before and after.
414.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
> He's already said that he'd follow all local laws I'm all for a good damning with faint praise, and this definitely put a smile on my face. I'm still convinced this is just the Twitter board calling Musk's bluf
415.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
I’m looking at this and thinking about how to model the cost of having creating a massive increase in the number of plays of one of these songs and the resulting Roi
416.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
I would be curious to see independent citations of these claims.
417.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
sorry, fair and true. My point was more how a company can create a difference between issued and authorized shares.
418.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
It’s important to note I didn’t say anything about his integrity. There’s a pretty significant area of scholarly research in business and entrepreneurship that criticizes “mythicization” of successful individuals. What those scholars argue,
419.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
See also: stock buybacks
420.
▲
by
avs733
5y ago
It’s a completely ridiculous narrative to think that musk is interested in anyones free speech but his own. We should all be more aware of when the narratives billionaires pitch about themselves become perceived to be objective reality.
More ›