avaer

8 ms·

121.
by avaer 3mo ago
The meaning of code will change. Maybe it will get a new name. Software hasn't been about "real code" (asm) for a long time; yes, this was a common opinion when HLL's and compilers were starting.
122.
by avaer 3mo ago
I think they are saying they didn't use AI for it.
123.
by avaer 3mo ago
> is it distillation Yes. Though it's probably mostly just other Claudes.
124.
by avaer 3mo ago
Maybe we should replace those people in power with machines that show empathy.
125.
by avaer 3mo ago
Sama was kept because of the cheddar to be lost if he left. If this interferes with the IPO, he'll get removed for the same reason.
126.
by avaer 3mo ago
Nobody spends 15M on inference only to check at the end that their money was wasted.
127.
by avaer 3mo ago
It's not, you just post this same comment on every HN thread.
128.
Kisak-Strike: 100% Open Source CS:Go(lwss.github.io)
2 points by avaer 3mo ago|0 comments
129.
by avaer 3mo ago
When this gets listed, your retirement savings will be obligated to support it whether it makes sense or not. If it tanks AI, or the broader economy, everyone will pay the price. No matter what, your money is going to Elon and friends. That
130.
by avaer 3mo ago
I guess the difference between "scam" and "financial engineer" is whether it works. If everyone loses their money it will be a scam. If people get rich he will be a financial engineer. These aren't two different thi
131.
by avaer 3mo ago
That's good! Because this stock has pretty much nothing to do with the reality of SpaceX or its future. It's a trillion dollar memecoin.
132.
by avaer 3mo ago
Excellent writeup. I wonder how many more decades it will be before it ships! In my experience with web standards bodies, features useful to actual developers get denied and hand waved away with a grab bag of excuses (especially "secur
133.
by avaer 3mo ago
> Second, can you guarantee that an AI company can’t use its AI to hide malicious code from AI audits. Who if not an AI company could have such an expertise? Any evidence for this conspiracy theory? It's not on anyone to disprove th
134.
by avaer 3mo ago
It's auditable, just redirect, don't pipe. Or fix your bash to not allow this. It has nothing to do with XAI, other than maybe not enforcing good practice (which most devs don't follow anyway).
135.
by avaer 3mo ago
The intelligence knob is hilarious. Just imagine vibe code slop streamers twiddling it like a DJ and the chat goes crazy. That's where we're headed.
136.
by avaer 3mo ago
It's Apache 2.0. You can have your agents audit it if you want. What does this release have to do with "trusting" XAI?
137.
by avaer 3mo ago
Is it a game, a console, or collection of games? Because the main page and FAQ say different things. It's probably all of the above; can empathize with pitching something as unconventional as this. But it might make for a stronger pres
138.
by avaer 3mo ago
I think most reasonable people can agree social media/internet can be a dangerous place where your images will be taken and posted to others without your consent. This isn't a matter of age. Except this is exactly what Heather Bur
139.
by avaer 3mo ago
Science and rigor has no place in "think of the children". What are you, a monster? (yes, this is sarcasm)
140.
by avaer 3mo ago
I hope HN doesn't get into moderating the politics of articles. I can see a grim future (present?) where "AI generated" turns into a slur, warranted or otherwise, in a world where the difference between human trained to talk
141.
by avaer 3mo ago
> Yes but I always have to be on the lookout for this meta pattern that leads to code bloat. You don't! Have you tried adding rules/automations that make it explicit to review and fix the code for bloat (per your taste, with ex
142.
by avaer 3mo ago
Right, but this just seems like underspecification. In my experience as both a team leader and an "agentic engineer" (ugh), I try to blame myself for the lack of clarity of my asks, rather than the person/agent for making the
143.
by avaer 3mo ago
Before my time ppl mostly did things in asm, I bet the vast majority of people reading this have never touched assembly and will never have any reason to. This is quickly becoming true of most "code". AI has changed that. One way
144.
by avaer 3mo ago
> For example, have you ever seen an agent follow the boy scout rule? Where they leave code better than they found it? And would you WANT them to try to do this? Yes, it's in the rules; run profiles, check code coverage, do a critic
145.
by avaer 3mo ago
Not directly related, but all of these "promotions", ads, "try new and improved!", "now introducing [drum roll] Gaia UltraMax CodePro with ChadBoost!", etc. feels like the frontier AI industry has devolved into
146.
by avaer 3mo ago
The icing on the cake is that users are ostensibly paying for the privilege. What a business model... If I had no morals and was running one of these companies I would be stealmaxxing before anyone notices the scale of the grift and regulat
147.
by avaer 3mo ago
Not the same thing. Cloud hosting couldn't get away with stealing your stuff. They would lose all trust, which was far more valuable than any individual piece of content. But AI is literally all about stealing and reselling content und
148.
by avaer 3mo ago
Even assuming the worst interpretation, I don't understand how his translates to the trustworthiness of an open source project.
149.
by avaer 3mo ago
I got a human taste of this in open source a few times: someone would suggest we use project Y rather than building it ourselves. I look at project Y and it's someone trying to make a business out of my FOSS code. This is getting worse
150.
by avaer 3mo ago
Why not a "stop killing AI" movement? If a company deploys a paid AI model and makes people depend on it, they need to dump the weights at EOL.

More ›