autobodie

7 ms·

61.
by autobodie 1y ago
They aren't replying to you. I sure hope you don't berate your poor tenants like you are commenters in this thread. You're a landlord, not a hero.
62.
by autobodie 1y ago
It won't be consistent because you will be raising the rent every chance you get. Trust me.
63.
by autobodie 1y ago
> You'll find out there's not enough room to scoot around your wife's thicc ass > That sounds… wildly specific to the US.
64.
by autobodie 1y ago
It was a perfectly fine example. Nothing in your comment has any relevance to what it's an example of.
65.
by autobodie 1y ago
> any drudge can do it if they’re prepared to sit in front of the computer for a few days It still remains a fact that most working people don't have a few days to sit in front of a computer making art. Especially not uninterrupte
66.
by autobodie 1y ago
Literally trickle-down economics.
67.
by autobodie 1y ago
No, we would see profits increase, and we have been seeing profits increase.
68.
by autobodie 1y ago
Get worse for who? The ruling class will simply never care how bad things get for working people if things are getting better for the ruling class.
69.
by autobodie 1y ago
Source? Keynes was a serious economist, not a charlitan futurist.
70.
by autobodie 1y ago
Keynes lived in a time when the working class was organized and exerting its power over its destiny. We live in a time that the working class is unbelievably brainwashed and manipulated.
71.
by autobodie 1y ago
That is extremely wreckless. The board is unquestionably the most responsible party.
72.
by autobodie 1y ago
One has to wonder why they don't just copy the Cuban model of having a surplus of their own slave doctors, especially given the supposed immense profit potential! To be honest, I'm not convinced of your explanation.
73.
by autobodie 1y ago
How is there a market for these unskilled slave doctors?
74.
by autobodie 1y ago
Why is there a market for these slave doctors?
75.
by autobodie 1y ago
> Why is that, I thought? That doesn't fit being sanctioned by the US(and vassals), being poor in general, and so on. I think the word for that is capitalist realism . You cannot imagine a motive beyond calitalist logic, but that
76.
by autobodie 1y ago
I think you're overcomplicating things. Castro was very vocal about medical care being a top proority during and after the revolution. There's no coincidence or conspiracy. When you try to build a society around human needs instea
77.
by autobodie 1y ago
Need more trains.
78.
by autobodie 1y ago
Yes, against all odds, Cuba has a great surpous of doctors. How do they do it, I wonder!?!?!?!?!?! (it has something to do with profit )
79.
by autobodie 1y ago
When a company is disgraced, the owners don't get replaced; the CEO does. The "responsibility" is primarily a matter of public relations. Whether or not the CEO does (or could do) the job 100% perfectly is irrelevant. I said
80.
by autobodie 1y ago
Sounds right, except calling Dali or Warhol "middlebrow." That's just weird.
81.
by autobodie 1y ago
No law specifically requires more than a coin flip, but firing people because some rando in HR "decided" without justification or documentation of cause can be risky.
82.
by autobodie 1y ago
If a company wants to stay in business, the legal risk of AI bots firing people is probably not worth the cost savings. Until that changes, I don't think there's much to discuss, but that may not be long given the way things are g
83.
by autobodie 1y ago
The most fundamental duty of a CEO is to accept responsibility away from the board members, hence the large bonuses when they are let go. By definition, AI cannot do this. End of conversation. Same goes for managers in most cases. Firing pe
84.
by autobodie 1y ago
Profit and income are two different things. Jobs make income, not profit. Aggregate profit and income from curation (both) have dropped off a cliff, so I'm not sure what your point is. Of course a select few will always be rewarded by
85.
by autobodie 1y ago
> immensely gratifying to me because it means humans will always need humans Just to confirm, this is sarcasm, right? It's hard to tell, and it's terrifying to me that so many people don't comprehend this as a basic fact
86.
by autobodie 1y ago
I have yet to see someone explain in detail how writing the same words as another person works (showing they understand the technical nitty gritty and the overall architecture of the human mind) and also layout a case for why it is clearly
87.
by autobodie 1y ago
Doesn't matter because U.S. ruling class doesn't agree.
88.
by autobodie 1y ago
>they can't just write a single thing that writes all wrongs. Found the attorney! Nobody asked for "a single thing that writes all wrongs." Simple, broad laws can absolutely be written, they are especially easy to write, a
89.
by autobodie 1y ago
I was going to be shocked if your case study actually found means testing worthwhile, so I read your entire comment, both others might not.
90.
by autobodie 1y ago
Wrong. The question asked the opposite; it asked if the means testing saved the government money. You answered "yes" in your original comment, but your supporting arguments imply "no" so I can see why people are confused

More ›