autobodie

7 ms·

31.
by autobodie 1y ago
If the prompt is good, the LLM will tell you when it's wrong, but you can use production testing if necessary like Tesla.
32.
by autobodie 1y ago
When I do that, they come back with something more simple than before but either wrong or still unnecessarily complex. Over the past week, I have been writing a small library for midi controller I/O and simple/elegant is the prior
33.
by autobodie 1y ago
More often, LLMs give me wildly complex and over-engineered solutions.
34.
by autobodie 1y ago
Profit over security, outsource liability
35.
by autobodie 1y ago
It's a lot of meandering and mundane analogies that don't work very well or explain much, so it's totally understandable that so many people have different interpretations of what he's even trying to say. The only consis
36.
by autobodie 1y ago
I don't think people are misinterpreting. People just don't find it convincing or intriguing.
37.
by autobodie 1y ago
Objectivity is lacking throughout the entire talk, not only in the thesis. But objectivity isn't very good for building hype.
38.
by autobodie 1y ago
If so, that certainly fits with my experiences.
39.
by autobodie 1y ago
"Behold the impeccable nuance of my opinion"
40.
by autobodie 1y ago
My experiences so far suggest that you might be right.
41.
by autobodie 1y ago
Why use AI to do something so simple? You're only increasing the possibility that it gets done wrong. Multi-cursor editing wil be faster anyway.
42.
by autobodie 1y ago
Haha, doing this with AI will bury you in a very deep hole.
43.
by autobodie 1y ago
I think that's wrong. I only have to write code once, maybe twice. But when using AI agents, I have to read many (5? 10? I will always give up before 15) PRs before finding one close enough that I won't have to rewrite all of it.
44.
by autobodie 1y ago
The Color Management Handbook for Visual Effects Artists by Victor Perez — I do not recommend it.
45.
by autobodie 1y ago
I read a whole book about this last year and it made me furious. Well, technically the book was about ACES but it was also about HDR and the problems overlap tremendously. I emphatically agree with this entire video and I will be sharing it
46.
by autobodie 1y ago
> The key is to not become a slave to them. To realize that our worth consists not in our ability to think. And that we are more than that. I cannot afford to consider whether you are right because I am a slave to capital, and therefor
47.
by autobodie 1y ago
I rest my case — the question concerns a quality, not a quantity. These juvenile comparisons are mere excuses.
48.
by autobodie 1y ago
If the student could reference notes a fraction of the size of the LLM then I would not be convinced.
49.
by autobodie 1y ago
Agree. Both sides of the argument are unsatisfying. They seem like quantitative answers to a qualitative question.
50.
by autobodie 1y ago
It's literally called a "living" wage, and I guarantee you in reality it's nothing more than that, if even. Life tends to always have unexpected costs. I shouldn't need to tell anybody that, including you.
51.
by autobodie 1y ago
How do you suggest authorities test people for homelessness on public transportation? Are you proposing any specific laws to manage antisocial behavior? In the end, I'm certain that the better idea is to simply give people jobs.
52.
by autobodie 1y ago
> I'm also tired of people becoming parents without considering the financial aspects ahead of time. If you're making minimum wage and are barely surviving, don't have kids until you're on steadier ground. Young is
53.
by autobodie 1y ago
Nonsense. You describe a world in which everyone has disposable income to navigate the market, picking and choosing as they please. Capitalism is not that world. Most people are just trying to keep their debt manageable enough to keep a r
54.
by autobodie 1y ago
$23.66/hour in Savannah, GA in 2025 is a starvation wage. Savannah has a bad housing squeeze with very few apartments and they still cost nearly $2K/mo when you find them. God bless those poor souls.
55.
by autobodie 1y ago
That would require everyone having a stable job. Something to think about.
56.
by autobodie 1y ago
The TCP?
57.
by autobodie 1y ago
> One caveat: I should be able to use it (and, hence, pay for it) anonymously. I assume you mean this as a moral claim and I can agree in that case. However, it's meaningless of course and kind of infuriating in any other light, b
58.
by autobodie 1y ago
Nonsense. There is a big difference between the implications of the following claims: 1. The specific people that are currently rich will become richer. 2. The people that are rich at any given instant in the future will be richer than
59.
by autobodie 1y ago
That's what they all say.
60.
by autobodie 1y ago
If you like the kitchen so much then build one for yourself?

More ›