ausbah

29 ms·

391.
by ausbah 4y ago
it's not like you can infer other rights at all https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Substantive_due_process
392.
by ausbah 4y ago
Roe v Wade was the court case giving a federal right to an abortion, that was struck down so it became a state's rights issue bc the federal gov't itself never passed a law guaranteeing the the right to an abortion. one major piec
393.
by ausbah 4y ago
yes thank you
394.
by ausbah 4y ago
>Its all just kowtowing to the power of the Global American Empire legislated by misguided civil rights legislation I would to know more as to why you this civil rights legislation, or presumably court rulings as well, are "misguide
395.
by ausbah 4y ago
what does citing the pareto principle here even mean? say 80% of programmers are "unproductive" isn't even what the principle even states. a generous interpretation in line with the line of though you've presented would
396.
by ausbah 4y ago
underlying their work sure, but I doubt many ML researcher will be recounting the definitions of items like backprop day to day
397.
by ausbah 4y ago
but most researchers don't use first principles day to day, like others in this thread -have said - if you don't use it you lose it. researchers don't utilize the details of back prop in there day to day work, so expecting an
398.
by ausbah 4y ago
has anyone applied compression techniques to large models like dalle-2?
399.
by ausbah 4y ago
the complaint is not environmental regulations, but how they are used to stonewall projects with heinous "environmental review". some obscure "endanger animal" is dug up local activists and cited as being threatened dela
400.
by ausbah 4y ago
any sort of military deployment as well I think
401.
by ausbah 4y ago
and conservatives control SCOTUS, which is the party we are discussing here.
402.
by ausbah 4y ago
yes so right now there is no debate, its one side imposing their beliefs unilaterally. there is no "both sides" when only one side has power
403.
by ausbah 4y ago
but its still an undemocratic process
404.
by ausbah 4y ago
yes clearly, so it follows the right of pregnant person's to decide what happens to their body trumps anything else
405.
by ausbah 4y ago
you know some technically minded folk love being "technically correct" on a subject
406.
by ausbah 4y ago
>I'd argue that where welfare of two beings is affected, you need to consider the rights of both. if you consider the welfare of the whole population then, you'd be ok if we took some people without asking and "donated&quo
407.
by ausbah 4y ago
even if you consider the fetus at any stage to be a living human being entitled to certain rights, it is in another body of which the "person inside" should have no say over because its not their body it would be like if you wok
408.
by ausbah 4y ago
the US never had forced vaccinations
409.
by ausbah 4y ago
its not really "both sides" when only one side is having a say in how the ruling is handed down
410.
by ausbah 4y ago
because the president is elected through the electoral college and the senate gives equal representation to states regardless of population
411.
by ausbah 4y ago
saying "SCOTUS didn't ban abortion" is at best useless semantic formality and at worst plain incorrect a number of state have laws that the automatically make abortion illegal as soon as Roe was overturned, those are now enac
412.
by ausbah 4y ago
most people do think that abortion should be law in some form, but since the US doesn't have a democratic basis in 5/6 of the federal government - "leaving jit to the legislature" is just as bad as letting SCOTUS decid
413.
by ausbah 4y ago
you can't say "figure it out democratically" with the Senate and electoral college saying "its the other branches problem" doesn't work either as SCOTUS is appointed by the undemocratic president and Senate
414.
by ausbah 4y ago
repeat customers are a highly sought after business outcome, users that are literally addicted to your product seems like something every business would desire
415.
by ausbah 4y ago
seems more like just a bad design
416.
by ausbah 4y ago
do you have any papers or keywords you recommend?
417.
by ausbah 4y ago
what firms are going to survive this, seems like everyone is being hit hard
418.
by ausbah 4y ago
>I think if employees feel slighted by being fired, they're fooling themselves. The best mindset is that you could be gone tomorrow. It gives you clarity and purpose. It also happens to be the truth. sorry but this reads like you dr
419.
by ausbah 4y ago
most US companies wouldn't be giving severance anywhere like this, much less severance at all
420.
by ausbah 4y ago
crypto is just like banking, which is an already regulated industry

More ›