4 ms·
>I'd argue that where welfare of two beings is affected, you need to consider the rights of both. if you consider the welfare of the whole population then, you
by ausbah 4y ago
>I'd argue that where welfare of two beings is affected, you need to consider the rights of both.
if you consider the welfare of the whole population then, you'd be ok if we took some people without asking and "donated" all their organs and other useful body parts to those who could use them
- rich_sasha 4y agoerm, no, that's clearly not considering the rights of the "donors".
- ausbah 4y agoyes clearly, so it follows the right of pregnant person's to decide what happens to their body trumps anything else
- rich_sasha 4y agoYou're implying the unborn human is not in fact a human and thus has no rights to consider. Or at least that the only rights to consider are those of the mother. Which may be true, but the whole point of my question is to see a proper argument in support of that.