Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
augment_me
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
61.
▲
by
augment_me
1mo ago
That's the whole goal with the pricing model. Its not predatory because the customer is still paying for it. There is a choice to not pay and use a different service. If there are reasons to not do so, we are not at the predatory level
62.
▲
by
augment_me
1mo ago
People like the knowledge that they are not being ripped off by the person they are interacting with. On Uber you are essentially guaranteed that you are paying the absolute max that you would accept algorithmically, and the driver is getti
63.
▲
by
augment_me
1mo ago
I want to see the political climate and situation that lead up to a decision like this. Like, if you just go off basic human desires, politics, the amount of money invested in outcome D, and how previous global events are handled. Humans ar
64.
▲
by
augment_me
1mo ago
Where do you live? Do all houseowners get kicked out of their homes? Do you raze all houses and build similar apartments and resettle people? If not, there will be inequalities. How does someone who is born into a shit house at a polluted s
65.
▲
by
augment_me
1mo ago
Try to convince the majority of the western world that are consuming the equal of 4-6 globes that they are eligible for: (1) National Park visit a year (3) RoboTaxi rides this week (2) Eggs for the week Who will do the planning? Why would
66.
▲
by
augment_me
1mo ago
UBI as a concept does not add up. It assumes an even production of all goods that people might need, but there isn't, you are giving everyone fiat currency that is not inherently tied to any physical good. Very fast you will descend in
67.
▲
by
augment_me
1mo ago
Sure but we can't work on hypotheticals. Otherwise we can also say that information work is 90% automated, society has 50% unemployment of white-collar workers and capitalism is over because there is no purchasing power. There is enoug
68.
▲
by
augment_me
1mo ago
You have market theory saying that at some point, you will not have enough seniors because no juniors were trained. So seniors will become more and more expensive due to lack of supply. At some point, it will be cheaper to take the risk and
69.
▲
by
augment_me
1mo ago
When you have everything, you want something new and different. The whole Epstein scandal is literally about this, you want to kill babies, r*pe the kids, do sacrifice rituals, etc because nothing gives you sensory satisfaction anymore. In
70.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
I found that a big issue with it in practice is that the numbers are just not great, and the repo is very vibe-coded. When the numbers are great, it's sometimes cheating with the setup. For example some GEMMs only compute each 8th valu
71.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
Good idea, would be interesting to cross-examine the benchmarks, but the page information is completely obscured by the AI slop. The benchmarks comparison and should start immediately instead of having random completely arbitrary complex he
72.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
Many open-source communities are wrestling with similar questions. In many ways the generic frameworks end up being reference implementations for the specific solutions to copy and hill-climb towards, and it's as you say unclear what t
73.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
One thing worth to note in the competition is that 8 out of the 10 top solutions, which all happened to be optimized this way completely broke at any other input than the competition ones. The only solutions that did not break when tested w
74.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
Does the actual outcome matter or does the promise/what is sold/pushed upon society matter? Was social media a clean win for human social interaction? Was fast food the replacement of food that was promised in the 70s? Were doctor
75.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
Thanks! Great read
76.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
If the task is to build something that requires abstractions, sure. But the article in question is in GPU-optimization-land, which happens to be an extremely verifiable and hill-climbable domain. Look at recent GPU programming competitions
77.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
People don't like this because you move the responsibility of verification to the reader. Does the program cheat? Does it just query a table is saved in some backend? Maybe, I don't know, you don't know, and since the author
78.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
Incentives from the article are for people who can afford to lose things, in other word rich people, people with safety nets, and people with social status. Most people dont have all these and follow incentives because its the way to go abo
79.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
No, you're right. I just dont see why the exploration of biological systems would be cheaper/more efficient in energy to do by humans rather than by computers if it provided some kind of benefit informationally in the future. Like
80.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
Ish, today I am on the fence because sometimes(half-half) its necessary, a year ago it was completely impossible, but I think its a question of context length, attention and task. Modern models can handle raw PTX pretty well. If you have be
81.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
1) I am talking about representations beyond language models and language embeddings. If you take for example image, video, audio, 3D-spatial DICOM or combinations like VLMs. If you ask a language model to make an image of a Begonia ferox l
82.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
This holds half-true. What we decided to do is essentially just hand-rolling PTX with the agents under a harness. If there is lacking some function, we write/take a CuteDSL kernel, export PTX on compilation, transform it with the harne
83.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
As much as I want to, I sadly don't think Information Theory makes sense in this setting, and I really wanted to believe this. When Shannon made his theory of information, he was always dealing with informational representations on the
84.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
So the machines should create the human-machine symbiosis for some reason, interesting... If I was the machine I would maximally want about the same symbiosis with humans as humans have with cows.
85.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
just take the cash
86.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
> "If that's the game we want to play, against an opponent that is self improving... that doesn't strike me as an excellent strategy. We should probably pick a different one." > "If the market doesn't rew
87.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
You will not get VC money for your bipedal robot startup with this pitch
88.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
Sure, but why would it be the ends of this process. Like, the comment above is arguing for symbiosys. My question is how does symbiosis make the system better or more efficient in the end. For example, if there is something to understand or
89.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
If this is true, what prevents a fully computer search from adding noise, branching or in general simulating diversity with evolutionary methodology, much more efficiently than humans?
90.
▲
by
augment_me
2mo ago
What is the capital market incentive for symbiosis? You are going to spend a crazy amount of time, money and effort to try to mix human behavior and cells to work with digital substrates. Or you can simply make a machine that does the same
More ›