3 ms·
Sure, but why would it be the ends of this process. Like, the comment above is arguing for symbiosys. My question is how does symbiosis make the system better o
by augment_me 2mo ago
Sure, but why would it be the ends of this process. Like, the comment above is arguing for symbiosys. My question is how does symbiosis make the system better or more efficient in the end. For example, if there is something to understand or gain from the biological systems, a fully digital system could probe it, emulate it and in general extract the relevant information much more efficient than a human.
- hmokiguess 2mo agoMaybe it's my lack of understanding, so correct me if wrong, but I believe biological systems complete emulation are not yet a solved problem. You can approximate, omit variables, deal with error correction, and, at best, model it in a way that extrapolates it but you cannot confidently assert. There's so little we know about biological systems despite much of the advancements, it's sort of pretentious to say we should give up on them because we can scale digital systems.
- augment_me 2mo agoNo, you're right. I just dont see why the exploration of biological systems would be cheaper/more efficient in energy to do by humans rather than by computers if it provided some kind of benefit informationally in the future. Like the symbiosis idea in the main comment is implying that humans are providing some type of informational value to the system at a lower energy cost/time spent, which given an intelligence described by the initial comment is a hard to believe because such an intelligence would figure out how to do it cheaper and better.