atomi

24 ms·

1. 211.▲
   by atomi 7y ago

   Yeah, it's the same reasoning for these laws here in the US.
2. 212.▲
   by atomi 7y ago

   For generations Hispanics were migrating to the states you mentioned. They colonized first. See Pobladores https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Los_Angeles_Pobladores Another group of people came along and decided that was
3. 213.▲
   by atomi 7y ago

   There are also signal jammers which I believe are _highly_ illegal.
4. 214.▲
   by atomi 7y ago

   They "requested" my phone number after the fact. And by "requested" I mean I wasn't exactly given a choice. I wasn't able to access my account until I provided a number. Of course all this was for "securit
5. 215.▲
   by atomi 7y ago

   > enough secure depot's ...like a Post Office?
6. 216.▲
   by atomi 7y ago

   A lot of his power comes from the insulation he receives from those around him. Generally this reliance leads increasingly to paranoia and in large part this is why we're seeing these crazy headlines. See Peter Falk in "The Mirror
7. 217.▲
   by atomi 7y ago

   You got a tough job buddy.
8. 218.▲
   by atomi 7y ago

   A lot of "Californians" are transplants or foreign born. Many of those are also conservative and don't mind moving to more conservative states. Native born are typically more loyal.
9. 219.▲
   by atomi 7y ago

   I wouldn't leave California for a million dollars. To quote a famous Californian, "I'd rather be dead in California than alive in Arizona."
10. 220.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    Human nature will dictate our fate. And it's not looking good.
11. 221.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    So I understand the lawyerly arguments here. You've done a great job explaining them. Here in California we do hold what citizens want to a great degree of value. We've worked for a more direct democracy with citizen initiated con
12. 222.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    More simply, "what the public wants" is irrelevant to the law? Am I understanding your position correctly?
13. 223.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    I don't follow. Are you suggesting laws or treaties are immutable?
14. 224.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    Generally speaking, people want public access to the whole of the California coastline. Any legal findings impeding access are a failing of law.
15. 225.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    > "weirdly biased" Yeah it is.
16. 226.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    My vote would be for Medal of Honor: Allied Assault. https://youtube.com/watch?v=U3EnVrAquBA
17. 227.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    I don't think hand waving the invasion of a neighboring country is going to change anyone's opinion.
18. 228.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    I think generally people don't like Russia's influence campaigns on Western democracies and that distaste bleeds over; not to mention it's imperialist campaigns against Ukraine.
19. 229.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    Were these repair parts that Apple refused to provide?
20. 230.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    But past that, there is a good GopherCon talk about structuring Go code: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oL6JBUk6tj0 Code practically writes itself (in my opinion) if you structure it well.
21. 231.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    On Firefox, one thing that really bothers me still is that it's impossible to remove a root domain entry from the omnibox. Like if I type "re" it completes to reddit.com even though I've deleted that entry. Chrome will r
22. 232.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    Bill Gates is cherry picked. Also, billionaires aren't accountable to an electorate.
23. 233.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    This is just a sliver of the perversion created when you rely on advertising for profits. Everyone thinks free stuff is great but it means you're the product and an entire global economic ecosystem is being built on that.
24. 234.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    DDG uses Bing I believe - take that for what it's worth.
25. 235.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    I think that's self-evident, thank you.
26. 236.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    Can you be more specific?
27. 237.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    Of course they can. And they can do so with or without consulting with a treaty partner. It's called sovereignty.
28. 238.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    So what? That's not to say Congress isn't able to resolve this through their own legislation. The judicial branch only interprets the law; they don't make it.
29. 239.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    Did you not read the relevant portion of California's constitution? If any judicial ruling or people like yourself find any ambiguity to those words, we'll make sure to clear them up for you in future legislative acts.
30. 240.▲
    by atomi 7y ago

    I've read our production has more than doubled since the 90's; wages have not.