athrowaway3z

8 ms·

61.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
Is that true per se? I was under the impression certain dedicated single-algorithm quantum computers might be much easier to build; allowing you to attack some construct but not yet do full Shor. PS I'm not saying that's whats hap
62.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
That is rather disturbing but this had me lol: > Spain is “making a big mistake,” said Bart Groothuis [...] “Spain is now dependent on the country with the largest and most sophisticated offensive espionage program directed against us.”
63.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
The two opening arguments are rather weak. - European group could not be infiltrated by a state-actor with 100billion/y budget and a history of doing so? - NOBUS today would not be secret in the algorithm but a quantum algorithm/d
64.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
Whats the revenue model for this NBPaaS? (No Bugs Please As A Service)
65.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
I suspect the mindset that makes you write these nonconstructive questions trying to be right instead of making sure we're on the same page, is the same one that is preventing you from entertaining the idea that people are able to coll
66.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
Pay what? Its a 'pure' system where nothing has to be denominated in money but instead we care about effects: taking-up-orbits, applying-force, and danger-pollution. The system requires the biggest player calculates the cost of no
67.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
You're not really good at asking anything. I did not say a system that benefits everyone. I did not say the dutch solved this exact problem, and my previous response was a best effort after you prompting me because i assume you've
68.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
You wish to take up a specific space, and with the right to use it come obligations. There was no tax or toll to consider. People naturally self-assembled under the idea that if you benefited, then you had to contribute. The calculation was
69.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
Anything you want to censor has at least 5 stages: Creator, first share (direct), second order sharing (public-ish website), third order sharing (indexed resharing), and finally the consumer wanting it presented. In the way there are things
70.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
The Dutch figured out how to do collective dike maintenance a millennium ago without inventing mythical super government. Collective rules worked just fine. I encourage you to reflect on this bias. I suspect you're taking the American
71.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
Senior Cloud Engineered Pipeline(d) Slop Frankly i'm fine somebody having an experience, and pulling it through an AI into digestible text to be shared. But for the love of god just put an AI Use Disclaimer at the top.
72.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
You need to figure out how to prompt to get much more concise code. This is just a casual scroll through for 2 seconds at function names i recognize and can tell are crap. https://github.com/kamaludu/bash4llm/blob&
73.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
The idea that things are created because there is long-running and expansive copyright, is a story that only became the norm around 1950 - i.e. boomers. Today any kids uploading their YT video thinks of their own copyright. This explanation
74.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
Targeting the kids is so infuriatingly successful tactics. It gives the adults the option to be apathetic. In reality, anyone who is a kid now will never know any better. It just means we're the last generations that had the luxury of
75.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
You call my comment word salad, but the model you present of supply-and-demand is so shallow it can't be used to explain why copyright was first created, and what problem it solved. Something that legislation about copyright usually do
76.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
I really hate the ethnical argument because It's so much weaker than people who use it imagine it to be. As a very flattened retelling of history, it was only with the boomers that we reached the tipping point on how people started to
77.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
A glance at the nmap one seems potentially high severity. It might be a nothing in practice, but it being around parser code means the chances of preparing something to jump around are pretty high. There'd be a certain irony being able
78.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
I had codex write a tool to extract all my pi sessions. (Had to filter out my prompts from the agents talking to subagents). Then I had it analyze the patterns i was making and turned that into the flowchart for the outer guidance-creating-
79.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
I hadn't seen star battle before. Was fun. Wanted to play another medium one so created an account and it opened up the same puzzle, so then i just clicked through what i remembered and now i'm way too high on the leaderboard. I f
80.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
This is me vibe-splaining something I don't know a lot about, but I doubt there is such a thing. If "all the knowledge" is what our models now do, what exactly would be the most extreme "none of the knowledge +search&quo
81.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
I think you're underestimating the elegance of "hey build X". It already captures a lot of what you're interested in. Additionally, with "Hey build X" nobody is happy with the methodology and people rightfully
82.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
There used to be a time when you came across accounts from 100 years ago - and you'd just be flabbergasted by the whimsical stupidity when laid out so plainly. Now we lament that in 70 years somebody is going to chuckle when they read
83.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
TNO is something like semi-DARPA. It gets a lot of stuff tax free and a lot of gov funding, but a lot of their budget is from getting businesses to hire their R&D teams. They do really good R&D on a lot of stuff. This is just their
84.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
I think you're underestimating the skill required to do it that well. Add 1 wrong feature and suddenly your simple project working around a DX tarpits is a new tarpit. A lot of devs like building features.
85.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
No serious economist would claim such a thing. In fact, it was all the rage a decade ago for economists to remind everyone that they - in fact - should not be looked at to do this. > An economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why t
86.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
There are quite a few machines connected to the internet right now with no owner. Boxes forgotten over time and power consumption not enough to matter. If we keep on the trajectory of energy usage and computation, in 50y you might have the
87.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
This cuts both ways. At any stage of https://www.macchaffee.com/blog/2024/you-have-built-a-kubern... a SOTA model can repackage it into Kubernetes. If you're feeling extra spicy you don't even need the d
88.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
A webserver shouldn't be calling io_uring internals without doing its own bound checking and http logic, nor should it be calling io_uring with remote-controlled crafted fd's or access pattern that might still have bugs in them. A
89.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
I think calling solar a little more performant is underselling it. Once you have LEO getting to a better orbit costs relatively little. Getting from LEO to the moon is only like 30% more than getting from ground to LEO.
90.
by athrowaway3z 4mo ago
I doubt it'll make sense any time soon, but some arguments I can think of are that solar in space can easily be ~50% more efficient at any moment while also being continuous (enough) in the right orbit. An even more radical idea is to

More ›