asudhakar11

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by asudhakar11 1y ago

   It should be able to tell you what assumptions it made. “Sales is $X because I assumed ARR and calendar year”. You’re then able to say great that’s what I wanted or “no I want bookings and fiscal year”.
2. 2.▲
   by asudhakar11 1y ago

   Why weren’t you able to show usable insights from data?
3. 3.▲
   by asudhakar11 7y ago

   Huddl.ai | Backend Engineer | US | SF Bay Area | FULL-TIME | ONSITE Huddl.ai founded by ex-Cisco Webex and Sun engineers, backed by Bain, Bloomberg and Propel, is building product to help make the most of every meeting. We're located o
4. 4.▲
   by asudhakar11 7y ago

   Possible to have small bad communities no? I'd argue % of bad actors (vs size) is the tipping metric. Also smaller communities like HN probably have a larger % of bad actors (small denominator).
5. 5.▲
   Why your story won't show up on Hacker News and why it probably shouldn't(adityasudhakar.com)

   5 points by asudhakar11 7y ago|2 comments
6. 6.▲
   by asudhakar11 10y ago

   thanks @vikrampatel. Pulling the data from a few places. The concept graphs are w2v and Wikipedia. The funding data is from sources like the NSF (I capture 90% of the $60bn of annual public funded research). Papers are from sources like Els
7. 7.▲
   by asudhakar11 10y ago

   Thanks @fasicle. That's a great idea and I'll work on it asap. Some limitations will be English speaking countries (my own limitation!) and data availability, but I'll look into it.
8. 8.▲
   by asudhakar11 10y ago

   Thanks @kyunbit! I'll point you to a cleaned up front end soon :)
9. 9.▲
   by asudhakar11 10y ago

   oops, looks like I linked to a test URL: here's a more reliable one! http://159.203.189.96/dojobs?mode=json&center=&summary=dna%2...
10. 10.▲
    by asudhakar11 10y ago

    Valid question @chinjoshi. Our funding data's pulled from sources like the NSF. These account for 90% of the $60bn of annual research spend in the US. Our patent data is pulled directly from the USPTO. And our papers published data is
11. 11.▲
    by asudhakar11 10y ago

    @ericsun, sure, I use a combination of W2v and Wikipedia for the concepts. I then query a repository that I assemble (funding, papers and patent data).
12. 12.▲
    by asudhakar11 10y ago

    @franklee2, sure. just change the text after the = sign. It needs some work, but you'll get an overall idea of who's doing significant work in the topic! It's a summary of funding, papers and patent data.
13. 13.▲
    by asudhakar11 10y ago

    Reddit AMA by Columbia CS prof on 3/6 at 10.30a PST on DNA computers. The link shows you who else has done work in the topic (needs better UI!). What do you think?
14. 14.▲
    Show HN: Find uni labs doing significant work in any topic(192.241.253.199)

    21 points by asudhakar11 10y ago|14 comments