asow92

17 ms·

211.
by asow92 3y ago
Population replacement rate is at least 2.1 kids per couple. What are you suggesting here, bud?
212.
by asow92 3y ago
So the risks have more to do with adoption of the language than the language itself? I studied Fortran in my college programming languages class (in the early 2010s) and loved it! Always wondered why it isn't used more.
213.
by asow92 3y ago
There probably are too many people in SF and spreading out would increase much needed housing supply in that market. On the topic of property tax, that very well might be true for CA, although NY and TEX property tax seems similar despite t
214.
by asow92 3y ago
Despite these concerns, Texas and Florida are gaining population and firms while California and New York are losing population and firms. How might this play out over the years ahead? What might this mean for the long term prosperity of th
215.
by asow92 3y ago
To stay on topic: does it seem to be making a difference in Texas? How or how not? Companies are moving to Texas, and cities like Austin seem to be popular amongst people who agree with leftist perspectives. fwiw, I'm from up upstate
216.
by asow92 3y ago
Was listening to a Peter Zeihan video yesterday about what makes Texas economically successful and he was saying that these big firms love Texas so much because it's a red state with blue cities: https://www.youtube.com&#x2F
217.
by asow92 3y ago
Developing software is hard. That's why they pay people money to do it.
218.
by asow92 3y ago
The irony here is that I shouldn't trust this either.
219.
by asow92 3y ago
A few years ago (pre IBM acquisition) a friend of mine at Goldman Sachs said that Red Hat was the greatest company in the world because they "sold free software".
220.
by asow92 3y ago
>It could very well be detrimental to release the list. I guess we'll never know, right?
221.
by asow92 3y ago
Touché, although, I'd still rather know than not know, ya know?
222.
by asow92 3y ago
Didn't know this, thanks!
223.
by asow92 3y ago
Not sure about others, but I'm loosing trust from this experience.
224.
by asow92 3y ago
> It is not clear to me that providing the list would be constructive I agree, it can't be clear unless you know what's on the list. More transparency is better than less, right? We're all adults here.
225.
by asow92 3y ago
Not disagreeing with you necessarily, although, how do we know we're better off for it if we don't know what's on the list?
226.
by asow92 3y ago
I guess I'm confused about what you're after here. Are you suggesting that the primary caregiver should be able to lean more on an increased amount subsidized daycare in order to pursue a personal life by working instead of stayin
227.
by asow92 3y ago
Are you proposing that we can do these activities if we have government subsidized childcare and don't work? How does that add up exactly?
228.
by asow92 3y ago
Do you have a kid?
229.
by asow92 3y ago
This just isn't true, that is unless, you've been tricked into tying up your personal identity with your job? When my wife and I had our son everything became clear and we realized that success at work was just a means to an end.
230.
by asow92 3y ago
?
231.
by asow92 3y ago
Small-town and low cost of living WFH is unbeatable for those raising a family. It'd take me about a 100% pay increase to drag me back to the city.
232.
by asow92 3y ago
That would be funny if it were true.
233.
by asow92 3y ago
I'm glad to hear your friend is doing well now. You're a good friend for helping him in his time of need like that.
234.
by asow92 3y ago
Sounds like the old tool maintainer isn't leveraging their scarcity power. If their skills are in high demand and short supply, and they can't be replaced, then shouldn't they make things take longer as they learn new tool? O
235.
by asow92 3y ago
Up above we see "Then you start learning the Starbucks menu". Does that seem like an honest take here? Surely folks "dancing around the fundamental constraints of reality" aren't about to start whipping up frappucci
236.
by asow92 3y ago
Obviously, but that doesn't change my mind here. If you're in the 1% of top performers, you have the cognitive ability to learn new things.
237.
by asow92 3y ago
You talk as if they're smart enough to learn something new. They're either smart or they're not. Which one is it?
238.
by asow92 3y ago
If you can't learn a new tool then you're just a tool yourself.
239.
by asow92 3y ago
I'll believe it when I see it. Until then I'm skeptical that enough people will want this until it's sub ~$1,500. I'd love to be wrong on this, but my gut tells me something's not quite right with this product verti
240.
by asow92 3y ago
You have no idea how my app works and are just assuming. You have no idea what you're taking about.

More ›