Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
asdfaoeu
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
39 ms
·
361.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
The wording they use makes it sound like the attackers compromised some Linode service to gain access to a specific customers machine rather than that customer themselves being exploited. If it was just a compromise of that customer there w
362.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
The number n has log(n)/log(10) digits so it technically take log(n) time to read it.
363.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Layer 3 is the network layer, basically they mean the attack is just generating enough traffic at the network level to overload the target. Layer 7 is the application layer which means they are overloading the application. A web server conn
364.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Just move it when/if they shutdown the service? It's not like they are going to suddenly shutdown the service or remove your ability to export contacts.
365.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
The "don't use bcrypt" is really just think about it before you choose it. He says in the first sentence "If you're already using bcrypt, relax, you're fine, probably." The other algorithms he mentioned were "scrypt" (mentioned already by G
366.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
If she actually answered the questions she proposed the article might have some weight. But instead she spends most of the article complaining about the people criticizing her. Unfortunately people like this make their money from stirring u
367.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Similar concept but the Google proposal is better for a number of reasons (I'm assuming Google's is based of public key cryptography). Yubikeys have to be verified by yubico so you have to trust them. This also means it can be safely used b
368.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Wow my bad, I had assumed DMCA counter notices were instantaneous.
369.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Why not just respond to the initial dcma rather than playing a game of cat and mouse. No one is going to use it while it has dubious copyright status anyway.
370.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Satoshi dice transactions pay relatively high fees and is probably the only reason transactions have any fees at all. Miners already limit the number of free transactions that are processed some (BTC guild) don't even process free transacti
371.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
You have to provide contact information any sane webhost is going to check the information is actually valid before taking down the content.
372.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Really they should have handled this the same way as the other case. Sent a 600€ request (or 6000€) for a donation to KDE and a NDA and possibly a licensing agreement. It's pretty clear Sony did not intend to do this and most likely just a
373.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
It's not one vendor it's just one (open source) implementation. I'd argue this is better for innovation as new features will be quickly ported between the vendor forks and spend more time improving the product than catching up to other im
374.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
He also ignores the situation where you want to upload it to an untrusted third party server where the javascript was obtained from a trusted server. Also the same problems of verifying the source exist in most closed source applications th
375.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
> We have temporarily suspended this advertising campaign pending a review of our policies that govern sponsor content and subsequent comment threads. looks like you're right
376.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Presumably it still checks the certificate is valid otherwise the worse case would just be that the legitimate site would not work.
377.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
I don't really see the point. Spdy is already supported by major browsers more than this would ever have. Why have half the features when you can have them all? Also browsers would need new APIs to deal with getting the data from slicing as
378.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
> I'm not sure the credit card will perform a chargeback in this case: it's not that Google is misrepresenting their product or the product isn't being delivered, it's that he's changed his mind. It is a valid charge, and I'm sure Googl
379.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
You can always just upload the nzb file to Usenet and reference that.
380.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
You should collect the useragent and whatever else you can grab. A url to share just a IP seems useless.
381.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
What is this the anti-fun brigade?
382.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Someone want to explain why this is less secure than other DRM methods?
383.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
I think he intended to reply the other comment comparing this to the evil issue. "This tool is for legal purposes" it doesn't restrict the use of the software (any legal use of the software is still legal, illegal uses are now just illegal
384.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
Does it work without being accepted into the beta? I would try but I'm at work currently.
385.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
It seems most of the backlash around that was due to you suggesting you publish IP addresses. Since you are already taking credit card details I don't think people would object to recording IP addresses to prevent credit card fraud (maybe o
386.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
I don't really understand his point, it's obviously quite different to passive surveillance cameras which: don't follow you around (are avoidable); don't generally record sound with enough fidelity to discern conversations; and are operated
387.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
They'd have some form of scheduling that would just restrict your CPU usage there they aren't going to shutdown your box just because it's under load. This would be for when you are making millions of unnecessary api calls or have a virus s
388.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
This comes up every time someone links to Google. If you have any Google cookies it will make you log in. Open it up in an incognito window or something if you don't want to.
389.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
I somewhat wish they had used something like the ruby style for this to allow chaining of the blocks e.g. 5.times{|x| x}.select{|x| x < 3}.collect{|x| x + 2} Edit: Ok ignore that it seems they do have that ( https://mail.mozill
390.
▲
by
asdfaoeu
14y ago
I don't see why we need click fraud blocking in the browser anyway, unless it was just a by product blocking malware, as it could be done way more effectively in the ad network.
More ›