asciicircum

4 ms·

1.
by asciicircum 9y ago
You're right, I assumed you defend the type of policies I disagree with without clarifying whether that is the case - I'm sorry for doing that, you were right. Regarding your reply: I agree with most of your reply and enjoyed read
2.
by asciicircum 9y ago
I'm sorry to hear you feel that way, that was not my intention. Could you explain when you find the time? I reread your posts and don't see where i am putting words in your mouth. Do you agree with my argument apart from whether
3.
by asciicircum 9y ago
> Unless Damore (or someone else) can reasonably estimate whether their theory around 'biological' differences result in a natural 10/90 ratio or a natural 49.9/51.1 ratio then there isn't really a case to be mad
4.
by asciicircum 9y ago
> in all cases, the party that gets rejected due to these policies is explicitly the party that statistically has the most opportunity in the ecosystem at large. You are possibly discriminating people unfairly. The evidence on causes of
5.
by asciicircum 9y ago
I'm not long enough in the workforce to have experienced open discrimination, so I don't feel qualified to comment on your overall question, i.e. on how my consideration of equality has changed due to the change in social climate.
6.
by asciicircum 9y ago
I don't want to put words in your mouth and would be happy to hear more of what exactly you disagree with in these quotes. Nevertheless, here's my take: >> Discrimination to reach equal representation is unfair, divisive, a
7.
by asciicircum 9y ago
Could someone opposed to the arguments the manifesto makes explain to me what quotes caused them to strongly dislike it? Reading the reactions to the manifesto I'm left feeling like I'm taking crazy pills. I must have read a diffe
8.
by asciicircum 9y ago
> Some see it as "just sharing an opinion" and others see it as "questioning my capability of doing the tech job" Could you point me to a quote taken in context that does that? I just reread the document and fail to s
9.
by asciicircum 9y ago
> You are saying what the guy posted wasn't offensive and also that everyone is finding it offensive. This is exactly what's been going through my mind following the threads on this issue today. > That makes no sense unless