Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
arunabha
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
[flagged]
92.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
If what you are saying is true, and it was the pilots fault, I'm wondering why did a corporation with the clout and resources of Boeing lose in court?
93.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
Yeah, but then you're depending on a notoriously fickle and unreliable person wanting or remembering to do that when the time comes. Sure, if you're a true believer in the cause you'll take that risk, but a majority of the pe
94.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
Yes, but even then, as an official, you don't know if you'll be sure to get one. A court ruling significantly increases the risk of wilful disobedience for officials and hence dramatically lowers the probability of being ignored.
95.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
Yes, it does. Because it draws a clear line in the sand. The administration can choose to disobey the order, but that opens up individuals in the govt to potential prosecution later. That's why governments try fairly hard to go the l
96.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
I'm really surprised to see this on the front page. Usually stories like this move off the front page in minutes. It's not because of flagging though. I had asked the question on a previous article which disappeared off the front
97.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
From the article > In 2016, I canvassed for Bernie Sanders. I spent my first day in Nevada > walking door-to-door in the desert heat with a dying phone battery and a stack > of printed papers delineating potential voters, thinking
98.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
The irony of a MAGA govt which claims to fight for freedom for individuals, trying to filter out potential immigrants if they have expressed opinions contrary to current dogma is particularly palpable.
99.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
But the executive is supposed to implement laws that Congress passed. So isn't the executive bound by the first amendment as well?
100.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
The truly depressing thing is, a lot of people are actually happy about this action. How did things get so bad, so quickly? People who lived under authoritarian regimes have long said that things move slowly at first, but after an inflect
101.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
Lots of good recommendations here, but I'll add mine which is Zhongba 1 year fermented light soy sauce. The long fermentation time and the addition of a specific white mushroom (口蘑 (kǒumó)) gives it a somewhat unique deep flavour witho
102.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
Choosing not to enforce the click to cancel rule is not Trump's fault? How so?
103.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
One piece of evidence would be that Russia, Belarus and North Korea have been specifically excluded from US tariffs. You could argue that the net effect is negligible since we don't import a lot from those countries, but the signal bei
104.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
At this point, the number of probable explanations for antics DOGE in particular and the administration in general are close to zero. One somewhat far fetched(till recently) explanation floated for the all out war on institutions waged by t
105.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
I can understand your position intellectually. Certainly, examples of right wing views being met with hostility can be found. But I hope you realise that whataboutism simply perpetuates the very behaviour that your are opposed to. If you ar
106.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
Have they? I believe they still haven't followed the supreme Court order in the return of Garcia and that was a unanimous decision.
107.
▲
by
arunabha
1y ago
The 'official' explanation that I got from Dang was that political posts hit automated software filters because of flagging and down voting which cause them to disappear from the front page. Separately, sometimes the moderation te
108.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
The GP post explicitly mentioned the growth of Chinese research capability that they directly saw. It's no secret that China has explicitly and deliberately invested in ramping up R&D. Also, requiring absolute proof in a system as
109.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
I am genuinely curious as to what your point is. Not saying it's wrong, but a succinct summary might be useful.
110.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
I am not sure how it's possible to defend the kind of stuff DOGE is doing anymore. Even the veneer of looking for efficiency is gone. There have only been claims of 'fraud' with no real evidence backing up the claimed scale o
111.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
I was following HN guidelines and trying to come up with the most charitable interpretation. However, try a I might, I can't come up with anything better than 'sheer incompetence' Tariffs can work, but they need to be paire
112.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
> So I took my complaint to my state's consumer complaints department. Let the two bureaucrats explain things to each other. Except that the prevailing direction of the country is to destroy the ability of governments to function ef
113.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
I'd say it goes beyond silence. Anything political used to be flagged and pushed of the front page in minutes till about a couple of weeks ago. Not very surprising given the current political environment.
114.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
Ending the statement with 'There is a list of things' and not providing it strongly suggests that you don't actually have any data or hard facts to back up your claims. You are a random person on an internet forum, the onus i
115.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
I really hope this story doesn't get ganged up on and flagged into oblivion. A few key things to note in the decision * The decision is unanimous with no dissents. * This case is pretty atypical of the other cases involving people depo
116.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
I am beginning to wonder if there is an actual plan behind these moves beyond creating uncertainty in trading partner's minds. The stated goal of the administration is to 'reindustrialize' the US by manufacturing more of the
117.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
Honestly, the biggest victory for the govt here is probably being allowed to invoke the act when the nation is clearly not at war. The act has previously only been invoked in war time. To allow the govt to claim that we are at war based on
118.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
> It becomes a hard job the instant that you have some passion or ethical concerns that drive you to create software that holds up to your own high standards and requirements. This is the hardest lesson to learn for a lot of software eng
119.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
I hope this one doesn't get ganged up on by the flagging brigade. Of late, anything even remotely political, esp if it's critical of Trump or Musk get flagged immediately and swiftly moved off the front page. Regardless of of your
120.
▲
by
arunabha
2y ago
Agreed, there seems to be a hidden ban on HN for political content.
More ›