ars

46 ms·

931.
by ars 3y ago
> When I think of "suppressed" demand, I think of economically useful demand that needs to exist. It's really not for you to decide what is a "useful" trip for people. That leads nowhere good. I mean, how far w
932.
by ars 3y ago
This is very bad advice. You should do the opposite of that. Buy Z-Wave devices and use them. They just work. Later, your Hub will add Tread/Matter support and you can do that too, but right now it's not worth the trouble.
933.
by ars 3y ago
True, but it's being wasted anyway. The amount of power dissipated in the daily tides is around 3.75 terawatt, around 3 million times as much. And don't assume this 1.2 MW adds to that total, a good portion of it is simply substit
934.
by ars 3y ago
Other humans however, have lost body parts, so the risk is known. They don't charge $0, but they don't charge very much either.
935.
by ars 3y ago
Wood is nowhere near strong enough for this. Metal is stronger than wood, and even that's not strong enough. Tensile Strength to Weight is the important measure here - but you can't just take a block of wood vs an equal weight blo
936.
by ars 3y ago
Insurance cares more about actual crashes. Of which there have not been a lot. If anything all this attention should reduce insurance costs, since the planes will now be even more reliable than before. Insurance does not care about the ap
937.
by ars 3y ago
That just moves the question to why does the law require it? Just for curiosity?
938.
by ars 3y ago
Why does it seem like most autopsies are done purely for curiosity, without any actual benefit to anyone living or dead?
939.
by ars 3y ago
> how can one wake up in the morning and seek for a safety exemption regarding It's because planes with this same issue are currently flying and it's an easily managed issue (i.e. don't use it when certain conditions happe
940.
by ars 3y ago
And even better when that person is you.... and you can't remember how you fixed it last time.
941.
by ars 3y ago
Much better, thank you.
942.
by ars 3y ago
Because the ceasefire was the number one demand by the South Africa. And they lost that, but the current title completely ignores that part, and instead highlights only the part that Israel lost. That's like exactly the definition of t
943.
by ars 3y ago
Isn't there a rule about modifying inflamatory titles? The article title "Top UN court orders Israel to prevent genocide in Gaza but stops short of ordering cease-fire" is less inflamatory, and will help prevent comments from
944.
by ars 3y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39140232 gave you the actual answer why it wouldn't work. Instead they might consider a second formation in orbit 90 degrees away from the first.
945.
by ars 3y ago
They have the original DNA so at least it would be very easy to determine guilt or innocence? If someone is under arrest can they refuse to give a DNA sample? Can cops take some hair left behind?
946.
by ars 3y ago
I'd like to see them run a known person's DNA through their system and see what it does. I'm sure the company has done this already, and they should share the results with the police to give them an idea of how reliable the r
947.
by ars 3y ago
That's a grouping meaningful to Christians themselves, but meaningless to non-Christians, which means it's not a good way for this survey to be grouped. To group things for statistics, pick the grouping level that is meaningful to
948.
by ars 3y ago
You misread the article. They believe in God, they just are not interested in grouping. So basically exactly the opposite of what you said: They specifically do not want to organize.
949.
by ars 3y ago
> "Within the Nones, however, atheists and agnostics are more likely to be politically and civically engaged, whereas those who responded that their religion is 'nothing in particular' are far less likely to vote." &g
950.
by ars 3y ago
Why would it get lost? The winds don't put things into orbit, they just mix up the air - if anything they uniformly mix all the gasses keeping even Helium from floating away.
951.
by ars 3y ago
You replied to basically nothing I said, other than to say: It's better if everything is split up into smaller companies that are not interesting targets. Nothing you said addressed the uselessness of encryption for this task. PS. I ho
952.
by ars 3y ago
I guess you didn't bother to look at your own link? Which clearly shows the biggest emitters are NOT that list.
953.
by ars 3y ago
> The biggest emitters? The US, China, India, the EU, Russia That's just a list of the worlds biggest countries. https://xkcd.com/1138/
954.
by ars 3y ago
Neither. The pressure was fine, the sensor or controller was not working correctly.
955.
by ars 3y ago
There's only a limited number of things that can be done that way. Basically point-to-point messaging. Most things aren't going to work with that model. Can Amazon ship you products without knowing what you ordered? Can you send a
956.
by ars 3y ago
I'm unclear how encrypting the data would help. The same breach that gives access to the data, can also decrypt it. (Also you wrote the same message twice.)
957.
by ars 3y ago
Because banks aren't just "store houses of money", they play important roles in the flow and quantity of money. (Each time they lend money they create money money out of thin air.) Which means there is risk in being a bank, a
958.
by ars 3y ago
Only in a closed universe, where light "wraps around". Otherwise it would look exactly the same.
959.
by ars 3y ago
Neon is condensed out of the air, any neon lost is just there in the atmosphere waiting to be re-condensed by someone else. The difference is Neon stays in the atmosphere, while Helium floats to the top and is lost.
960.
by ars 3y ago
The "network" argument is true for collectibles as well. There is a human network of people interested in collectibles. Putting it on a computer is not a material difference.

More ›