arrowtrench

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by arrowtrench 1y ago

   Is local-first bad / more difficult for collaboration because of conflict resolution? (E.g., two users edit the same document when they're offline and then, during syncing, they find that their versions diverge too much for them t
2. 2.▲
   by arrowtrench 1y ago

   Offline read-only would already be a great feature for me, knowing that my data is always close to machine. But, my guess is that this isn't enough of a killer feature for most people to care.
3. 3.▲
   by arrowtrench 1y ago

   Maybe the OP is saying that the advantage of "self-hosted [traditional/non-local-first] apps" over "local-first apps synced to someone else's server" is that with the former you get to control the server. Of co
4. 4.▲
   by arrowtrench 1y ago

   Managing servers that store terabytes of data for you isn't exactly the same as configuring and stitching Linux programs together.