Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
arolihas
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
19 ms
·
241.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
Thanks I didn’t hear about that
242.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
Alright, what do you want? Specifically, what will it take for you to believe the results of the presidential, senate, house, and local elections are legitimate?
243.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
What will make you think this election was fair? To me it seems like the only way Trump supporters and Trump will be convinced of the results is if they say he won.
244.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
To be fair if you put Trump under oath he’d get himself charged for perjury by the evil democrats. Really the only thing he could’ve done is incite a mob (this may be too sarcastic for HNs taste but screw it, HN has no taste upvoting basele
245.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
Wow you have means, motive, and opportunity. Now all you need is this pesky little thing called evidence of any such fraud occurring. It’s a big roadblock though, understandably, no one has managed to produce anything of note that could be
246.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
I know elections aren’t court proceedings. But if you believe the results are unfair, then you’re implying some crime took place, namely fraud. You can prove that in court with a preponderance of evidence or beyond a reasonable doubt, but L
247.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
It left him unscathed though, so it’s fine.
248.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
Yes. Innocent until proven guilty. If you are claiming an election was conducted illegitimately then you are accusing multiple election officials of fraud. This requires evidence, something the Trump legal team didn’t have.
249.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
4 people died.
250.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
The onus is on your side to show how this election was stolen. All of your rhetoric about the left hating trump is not evidence of any fraud. One could’ve said the same things about Hillary Clinton in 2016, who’s been reviled by the right
251.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
I hope the wonderful moderators don’t just censor anyone who happens to say something you don’t agree with or hurts your feelings.
252.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
You are the one stating there is a real cabal, why don't you provide proof of who is in it, what they do, and how it works. Until you have that I'm not going to pretend that what you propose is the case. That which can be easily a
253.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
He asked for specific evidence for your beliefs, that is absolutely a challenge. You couldn't rise to the occasion and give proof. You don't have to condescendingly tell me to not believe in your ideas, you already made it extreme
254.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
So the tweet that wasn’t taken down is the one that isn’t a call to violence. Good to know.
255.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
Either he’s serious and just deluded, or he’s acting in bad faith. In both cases you just shake your head and move on because no minds will be changed.
256.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
To those who downvoted, was I wrong? He straight up ignored it.
257.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
So I can’t say “these people” when referring to the ones who stormed the capitol or support that treasonous act because they wrongly believe the election was stolen? Is that really just as bad as referring to black people as “these people?”
258.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
These people don’t listen to facts. They argue that the election results should be in favor of trump and that it was stolen and fraudulent. At the same time they insist that all of the Republican wins are perfectly valid. There’s no logic o
259.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
This is ridiculous, people shouldn’t have to give up their anonymity to debate their ideas.
260.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
It’s not a matter of belief. I’m reading the words you wrote, specifically your last paragraph. If your ideas hold up surely you’d be able to answer his fairly basic questions. But they don’t which is why you resort to asking for peoples em
261.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
I see. I guess I should have just stated that no actual evidence has stood up in the court of law by Trump’s legal team that has the most incentive to show such damning evidence. What’s crazy to me is that this community is more welcoming t
262.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
This week in ML/AI (TWIMLAI) Software Engineering Daily History of Philosophy without any gaps If I Were You, very funny advice podcast
263.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
Did my comment break some guideline? If you find it problematic, please reply and explain to me what’s wrong instead of downvoting. I would greatly appreciate it, thank you.
264.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
The ways of HN are a mystery to me as well.
265.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
Unfortunately he already said he is not going to debate this probably because it falls apart under any informed scrutiny.
266.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
I don’t see a flag?
267.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
I’m confused. The Trump video they posted at the end was on Twitter. I believe it was taken down for election misinformation (it was not a landslide in trumps favor) and if you go to his page you can see his tweets calling for peace at the
268.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
So sad I have to scroll down this far to see this be acknowledged. Not surprising though
269.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
They stormed the capitol because they believe the election was stolen without any evidence or facts with any basis in reality.
270.
▲
by
arolihas
6y ago
He won’t listen to this, he’ll make up some excuses of it being out of context.
More ›