armsmasher

4 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by armsmasher 11y ago

   HTML doesn't work in this forum, apparently. In any event thanks for reading.
2. 2.▲
   by armsmasher 11y ago

   <i>isn't the point of the article that they are not taxed at the rate of a normal condo vis-a-vis their sales price?</i> That isn't the point I'm making. Ultra-luxe condos are taxed the same way as normal con
3. 3.▲
   by armsmasher 11y ago

   (author here) To your point: "They are not and should not be taxed like single family homes or condos." They are taxed like condos—they are condos. I think the larger issue in this story is that the tools for assessing tax value a
4. 4.▲
   by armsmasher 11y ago

   Author here (thanks!), and yes, you're right, the alternative to ultra-luxe construction is more frightening, and we know that because of San Francisco. That's worth keeping in mind.