arkadiytehgraet

5 ms·

1.
by arkadiytehgraet 3mo ago
Kotlin 1.0 was released early 2016. I can see why YouTrack team might not have wanted to commit using an unstable language, though I can also see the dogfooding angle.
2.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
Regardless of the content, this is one of my most favourite talks ever, especially in the delivery aspect. It served me as an inspiration for quite some time when I had to present anything to a wide audience.
3.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
You got baited by a confirmed Anthropic shill, see more info here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270186
4.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
You got baited by an Anthropic shill, they are not working at any big tech company. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270186 for more info.
5.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
solenoid0937 is not working at any big tech company, instead they are being paid by Anthropic to spread unfounded LLM-hype. They have a history of doing that. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270186 for more info.
6.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
It specifically has deteriorated because of the people like you, who peddle unfounded AI-hype while being on the payroll of one of the major labs and not disclosing it properly. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270
7.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
Once again, no proofs of your claims, only more LLM-hype and personal attacks. No, you are intentionally being obtuse, because people have already called you out on your lies. Saying "my team worked on <X>" is not under NDA
8.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
Nothing of substance yet again, more unfounded LLM-hype. As a reminder, this whole thread started by other people asking you to provide examples or proofs of your outlandish claims. Instead of doing that you ignore the questions or cover be
9.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
I have explicitly stated more than once, beforehand, what would have given you a benefit of doubt from my perspective. Even after reading all that you opted for answer evasion, rather than providing any substance, as you do with all the que
10.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
Perfect excuse for avoiding any substance (except no one asked you to give up the advantage or secret sauce of using LLMs, only the end examples of what has been achieved with it). It is also funny how you always leave out the name of the c
11.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
It is not just me who finds solenoid0937 account suspicious: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48173975 I did not have to go through "so much of their history", this is just the last 9 days. There are considera
12.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
You could have easily disproved my claim by linking your comments with a more balanced or nuanced opinions on the matter, except you cannot, because there is only even more outlandish and wild stuff you say about AI and LLMs.
13.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
You got baited by an LLM-hype peddler and Anthropic shill, do not expect anything of substance. See https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48272695
14.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
Here, just a few examples over the last 9 days, in no particular order of exaggeration magnitude: Unsubstantiated claims of 3x-10x productivity at allegedly a FAANG: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48174666 More claims
15.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
OP (solenoid0937) is an unfounded AI-hype peddler and an Anthropic shill (check their comment history), do not expect them to provide an actual example of their wild claims.
16.
by arkadiytehgraet 4mo ago
There is plenty of unfounded AI-hype astroturfing going on in HN that each instance absolutely deserves to be called out. This guideline is somewhat antiquated for the LLM era. Reporting posts and accounts spitting out blatant LLM-slop does
17.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
Did your LLM context get blown up or why does your comment read like linkedin-style post with one-liner sentences structure? Did you really just claim that people are so gullible that it was social media or whatever that made them believe t
18.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
> frequency bias Gaslighting again, Anthropic shill. What does frequency bias have to do with the objective fact that hundreds of people reported their own experiences with LLMs being degraded over a short period of time? The very same t
19.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
> Again, you're just interpreting anything that goes against the "AI bad" grain as shilling. Once again, putting "AI bad" into my words. No, Anthropic shill, this is not what I am saying. Is your LLM malfunctioni
20.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
You tried arguing with Anthropic shill, larping as a FAANGer, peddling absurd LLM-hype. Check their history.
21.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
> Feelings Nice gaslighting, Anthopic shill. No one said a word about feelings, only you (to derail the conversation). People reported their own experience and frustration with the model being unable to complete tasks they previously cou
22.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
Nothing to do with disagreement, I only call "Anthropic shills" people who are explicitly and shamelessly shilling for Anthropic. You still ignore the point that shilling adds bias to all your comments, so other readers have to ac
23.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
You are an Anthropic shill, and this is an explicit marker that needs to be added to all of your comments, so that all information you provide can be adjusted for that bias. But I do understand why you ignore this point since it devalues al
24.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
You are replying to an Anthropic shill, check their comment history. They likely never used AI in development, only LLMs for their comments on HN.
25.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
If you are an LLM-hype peddler, you really should not be offended at being called out. Also, this is the merit you are ostensibly looking for — since you are a shill, everyone should know this first before taking your words seriously. You s
26.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
This account is an LLM-hype peddler, shilling for Anthropic (check comment history). If they say that Claude is not nerfed, then most likely it is, in fact, nerfed.
27.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
There have also been winners of a slot machine gamba, so the analogy quite holds. I would even argue that there are considerably more slot machine gamba winners than the real world examples of actual LLM work.
28.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
There are plenty of shills for all of the major labs on this website. Usually checking a history of comments of a suspicious user reveals that quite fast.
29.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
It's really telling how davidu, a GP at a16z, investor in Flock, author of https://a16z.com/announcement/investing-in-flock-safety/ is losing his mind about his investment being called out on corruption, whic
30.
by arkadiytehgraet 5mo ago
This is likely a fully LLM-generated reply.

More ›