ares623

29 ms·

781.
by ares623 10mo ago
Maybe it allowed spitting out copyrighted works verbatim
782.
by ares623 10mo ago
Go further. Violence (or the threat of it) is the only moat.
783.
by ares623 10mo ago
I chuckled
784.
by ares623 10mo ago
I declare AGI!
785.
by ares623 10mo ago
Silver lining is that maybe game development can get back to more sustainable levels.
786.
by ares623 10mo ago
Not if Private Equity can help it!
787.
by ares623 10mo ago
Well said. It’s not quite at the same level but it reminds me of YouTubers who get products from companies for free for a “review” and then they say “no money exchanged hands”. The incentives are implicit wink-wink and everyone knows it exc
788.
by ares623 10mo ago
> More guardrails means a shitter product for all of us the horror
789.
by ares623 10mo ago
I think you have it backwards. OpenAI and others have to be more responsible deploying this technology. Because as you said, these things come with tradeoffs.
790.
by ares623 10mo ago
You’re absolutely right!
791.
by ares623 10mo ago
When millions of man-hours are lost waiting for your service to be back up, I think that deserves a bit of resiliency.
792.
by ares623 10mo ago
I would argue that evolution’s primary driving force is not something so easily resisted. It is literally a person’s only purpose when you strip everything else away. I would be careful to handwave away another person’s desire to have child
793.
by ares623 10mo ago
Why do journalists still report on things the White House says as factual? It has no credibility.
794.
by ares623 10mo ago
2nd time’s the charm right
795.
by ares623 10mo ago
Wow! I didn’t see this one coming.
796.
by ares623 10mo ago
“If” doing a lot of work here
797.
by ares623 10mo ago
> 5 years ago one parent's income was enough > now both parents working > barely enough to keep up with expenses and chores > child has no allowance to go out > very limited spaces to go out for free > live in a poore
798.
by ares623 10mo ago
Would you trade your livelihood to continue to make such music? Would you trade someone else’s livelihood? Because ultimately that is what is being marketed/sold right.
799.
by ares623 10mo ago
That’s because there is no nuance to how AI was built/trained and how it operates. As someone else put it: It is a rude technology that deserves a rude response
800.
by ares623 10mo ago
Hah, that's a fair point. Same energy as "My parents hit me all the time and I turned out just fine!"
801.
by ares623 10mo ago
For the shareholders, the only ones that really matter
802.
by ares623 10mo ago
What. That’s written in a way that’s like “men writing women”. Not putting themselves in the shoes of a junior who has no context or almost no opportunities.
803.
by ares623 10mo ago
If the AI gets so good then they shouldn’t need to pre-learn.
804.
by ares623 10mo ago
Couod this be used on a new form of forum where every other post or comment is poison? For people who want to share content for other humans exclusively and would prefer to not have their content scraped.
805.
by ares623 10mo ago
Roombas
806.
by ares623 10mo ago
No, I was being snarky and that was a mistake and I apologize. For some reason I thought the person above was happy or okay with the current state and can just fck off if/when it affects them negatively. I basically did what they plan
807.
by ares623 10mo ago
I’m 100% convinced they send those out purposefully to encourage users to log back in.
808.
by ares623 10mo ago
Is there one for images?
809.
by ares623 10mo ago
Everyone will adjust pricing to cover losses ad infinitum
810.
by ares623 10mo ago
At least they’re honest.

More ›