aredox

62 ms·

421.
by aredox 2y ago
lol
422.
by aredox 2y ago
>Displacing the dominant browser has been done before. It can be done again. Why? You skim over all the things that make the present and the future different from the past. The size of the audience is not the same, the size of companies
423.
by aredox 2y ago
>But it has made a lot of progress in a relatively short time. That's always the case at the beginning. And then it stalls. That's exactly the gripe with fast-moving web standards: the churn kills browser diversity by exhaustio
424.
by aredox 2y ago
You've missed Firefox's marketshare inching towards irrelevance, its revenue - "charitable" donations from competitors worried about monopoly lawsuits that can stop at any time - in freefall, and more and more websites
425.
by aredox 2y ago
What is ladybug's marketshare? Does it work flawlessly with "This webpage works better with Chrome" webpages? It is not even mentioned on https://caniuse.com/?search=web%20components
426.
by aredox 2y ago
Look at the market share. And look at how much breakage report there is with Firefox vs. Chrome or Safari (not to say the return of "this website works better with Chrome" disclaimers, as if we were back to IE6).
427.
by aredox 2y ago
Red spots on the skin -> coagulation problems is fairly basic medical knowledge. Even a cursory Google search would be enough to get that answer.
428.
by aredox 2y ago
Something something survivorship bias.
429.
by aredox 2y ago
One could have done exactly the same thing with expert systems we had in the 60s. Or a checklist. Or a reference book. Far more reliable, no risk of hallucination.
430.
by aredox 2y ago
You want to save more than one life? Tax the rich.
431.
by aredox 2y ago
>getting me from A to B safely and cheaply And how do you expect that to be true when Elon, through his political power, has all regulators under his thumb?
432.
by aredox 2y ago
At least you could buy a VW from 1945 on and not finance the Nazi war machine. But before that? You were a clear collaborator.
433.
by aredox 2y ago
Clearly, if you want to buy a Tesla because of "Ecology" and "the Planet", there is no reason to do so anymore as your purchase directly funds the exact opposite of what you want to achieve. Same with superchargers.
434.
by aredox 2y ago
I read the wikipedia summary, and it was full of half-truths or outright lies. >small state is internally democratic and its government has to serve the individual This has never been true, there is no relationship at all between size an
435.
by aredox 2y ago
I think this is taking it backwards: communal places are dying because of a deeper trend of di-socialization. You can't make those spaces work for long if nobody comes there. What I notice here (Switzerland) which has a lot of clubs
436.
by aredox 2y ago
AI can't calculate anyway, so, you're doing good.
437.
by aredox 2y ago
Yeah, but now?
438.
by aredox 2y ago
SpaceX has a clear mission; Tesla not so much. What is the use of building electric cars "to save the planet" while your boss is enabling a ton more environmental damage using the money from Tesla sales and charger network (and hi
439.
by aredox 2y ago
The reason that twitter became "the place where a nobody could talk to an expert" (at the time it wasn't the place to mob experts) was the utter design failure of email against spam. Nowadays people don't publish their e
440.
by aredox 2y ago
And Ukraine gets to keep the Russian territories it holds? And also Ukraine gets under a Nuclear umbrella? The US was already supposed to protect Ukraine's borders according to the Budapest memorandum. What proof do you have the US wil
441.
by aredox 2y ago
>Who benefits from the defense of Ukraine? Do you want to have nuclear proliferation? Because if countries can redraw borders by brute force, then nukes are necessary for every state that want to survive.
442.
by aredox 2y ago
Again: since then end of the Cold War - and even before - the US has undercut at every turn both the European Military sector and any political attempt at a common military policy. At every turn. The US has always wanted the EU to be a &quo
443.
by aredox 2y ago
This bullshit can look reasonable, but the US has undercut the European Defense initiatives and industry at every turn during the last 30 years, using their geopolitical reach and tools like Echelon for industrial spying to win military pro
444.
by aredox 2y ago
Then why are they wasting time "reviewing" the IRS in the middle of tax season?
445.
by aredox 2y ago
There are fascist, but of the Mussolini type, not the Hitler type.
446.
by aredox 2y ago
Funny you say that when she was cast again and again as a "crazy" "radical" "socialist" "lunatic". Which one is it?
447.
by aredox 2y ago
Competent enough not only technically, but also to "handle" Musk to keep him away from her. https://www.reddit.com/r/EnoughMuskSpam/comments/z2ofwk/i_wa... I wonder if he ever asked her to bear
448.
by aredox 2y ago
It is terrific - but I warn you it is a tear-jerker. It has been going through many film festivals - but there is still limited distribution outside of China.
449.
by aredox 2y ago
>when the previous admin was in did they take in the considerations of the losing party? Yes. Many big bipartisan bills, immigration crackdown that Trump can't even match now.
450.
by aredox 2y ago
Wasn't the previous administration voted for too? Remind me how many people voted for someone else than the current president?

More ›