3 ms·
One could have done exactly the same thing with expert systems we had in the 60s. Or a checklist. Or a reference book. Far more reliable, no risk of hallucinat
by aredox 2y ago
One could have done exactly the same thing with expert systems we had in the 60s. Or a checklist. Or a reference book.
Far more reliable, no risk of hallucination.
- lblume 2y ago> Far more reliable, no risk of hallucination. Only as reliable as the information contained in the system. The whole point of an LLM is to agglomerate as much information as possible with little manual intervention which causes them to both be a) far more intelligent and knowledgeable than any old-school symbolic expert system, and b) also more prone to biases and hallucinations.
- aredox 2y agoRed spots on the skin -> coagulation problems is fairly basic medical knowledge. Even a cursory Google search would be enough to get that answer.
- jodrellblank 2y agoI don't have an expert medical system from the 1960s and an IBM 360 to run it on. Or a checklist [that I know is relevant]. Or a reference book [that I know is relevant, and know where to look in it, and what to look for]. What then?