ardit33

244 ms·

1981.
by ardit33 19y ago
40-80 man hours -- are you sure about that? anything more than trivial it will require more than that.
1982.
by ardit33 19y ago
80,000 to 120,000 depending on experience. Anything less, and you are getting screwed. Anything more, and you are actually good either technically. or at negotiation. Don't sell yourself for little thou. You have all the power of negotiat
1983.
by ardit33 19y ago
hey, Why I did got negged? Seriously, people, chill out.
1984.
by ardit33 19y ago
oh common. yet another rippoff. this web 2.0 is getting silly. dig+reddit+collegehumor+??? = profit
1985.
by ardit33 19y ago
wtf was this?
1986.
by ardit33 19y ago
Haha. Maybe next year. It has taken decades to reach to the RDMS that we have today. They have improved efficienncy by time, but the inovation has stoped. Any new system, (OOD) will take years before reaches the maturity level to be u
1987.
by ardit33 19y ago
Maybe b/c there haven't been any good attempts at it, and the major players (oracle) don't have incentives to build such systems. Getting OOD Right, would be a huge task. Why do invest on it, when you are already making lots of money on th
1988.
by ardit33 19y ago
duh. Hibernate has been doing this for ages, before even rails existed. And it is a mess. You are trying to shoehorn a solution (ORM) so the database will fit the way you would like that data back. How about actually having the database s
1989.
by ardit33 19y ago
Have you heard about filters? That's what they exactly do, narrow your choices according to specific circumstances. You get the list of object that fits the exact pattern of a filter (or multiple filters), and you are done (ok. maybe in
1990.
by ardit33 19y ago
No it is not stupid. RDBMS are old thinking, and have not inovated in decades. They made sense when procedural programming was all the rage, now they just don't anymore. My ideal database would just act like a big hash table. Where I can
1991.
by ardit33 19y ago
utter crap. Go back at the drawing board. Make something more tangible, enough with the pies on the sky. These are concrete ideas: Facebook, just like your silly school book, but online, and you can add friends Google - search engine Yel
1992.
by ardit33 19y ago
Get roomates than. With another roomate, you can split a $2200 bedroom, and end up paying around $1100, which is more reasonable. Another warning: Find a job before coming here. It can be hard to find a good one, and usually takes time.
1993.
by ardit33 19y ago
All of Sillicon Valley is just a strip mall wasteland. If you are European, or lived in Boston/Nyc/D.C. it will be the most boring place in earth to live. (I have no clue how people living there are not shooting themselves with a shotgun.
1994.
by ardit33 19y ago
Good product (or idea). Good chunk of equity ( if you are offering a good salary but a petty stock options package, then you just going to get mediocre people that want a job). Let techincal people feel they will have a great impact on th
1995.
by ardit33 19y ago
That's complete bullsh!t. It is execution that matters. Ideas are a dime a dozen. What google did was excellent execution of an non-original idea (there were lots of search engines at that time). Look at the UConnect vs. Facebook. vs. th
1996.
by ardit33 19y ago
Awesome! There is nothing like mom's cooking. I just wish I had my mom around :(
1997.
by ardit33 19y ago
I hate to say it but I found The Myth of Innovation not a good read at all. It is very amateurestic (Scott routinely cites wikipedia), very fluffy, and with lots of childish notes. Scott came at my company and gave a speach/presentation,
1998.
by ardit33 19y ago
Tirana Albania, and San Francisco
1999.
by ardit33 19y ago
oh boy, I can tell that just by asking this question you clearly know nada about the mobile world... good luck, don't let it discourage you.