3 ms·
Haha. Maybe next year. It has taken decades to reach to the RDMS that we have today. They have improved efficienncy by time, but the inovation has stoped.
by ardit33 19y ago
Haha. Maybe next year. It has taken decades to reach to the RDMS that we have today. They have improved efficienncy by time, but the inovation has stoped.
Any new system, (OOD) will take years before reaches the maturity level to be used in commercial solutions. Kinda hard for a cash strapped startup.
Also, there have been attempts to build OODs but they have failed, mainly b/c they way ahead of their time.
What I would like to see a distributed Object Oriented Database system, that can scale at will.
- jimbokun 19y agoI think Ellison and the Oracle guys consulted for years in order to eat while working on their relational technology until they thought they were close enough to go for it and drop the consulting and bet everything on the database as a product. Maybe you could take a similar approach?
- stuki 19y agoCheck out Gemstone/S. A distributed, persistent and transactional Smalltalk image. It's flat out cool. As far as I know, they have even ported Seaside to run on top of it, which would make it the ne plus ultra for rich object model web app development. Just like every other odb or network db, the problems only surface when you need to query along paths you didn't design for up front (i.e. when you can no longer chase pointers). That's where rdbms' really shine. And when people not intimately familiar with your apps' object model need some of its data. Expecting some 'analyst' somewhere, to fire up a Smalltalk image, in order to create a report making his boss look good, is probably a bit much.