arder

7 ms·

31.
by arder 2y ago
I feel like the US should have serious conversations about it's regulation of monopolies, especially on internet giants. The current system seems to be woefully ineffective. On the one hand, it's not clear it's necessarily, G
32.
by arder 2y ago
I'm a shareholder. The company does something I don't like. I file a lawsuit. The lawsuit costs the company time and money and possibly forces them to change their policy. Is this good for my immediate financial interest in the co
33.
by arder 2y ago
You can absolutely turn up to the interview and claim a bunch of protected characteristics you don't have. I would wager it is not going to increase your chances of being hired.
34.
by arder 2y ago
There are a few good reasons to sue as a share holder. The first is that you just have different interests. For example, the board and CEO decide to do something that benefits themselves and their other financial interests. In that case you
35.
by arder 2y ago
It's especially not how people shop at Amazon. You could feasibly imagine a shop where there is basically 1 version of each thing. Like the low cost supermarkets in the UK, they're efficient because they have very small product
36.
by arder 2y ago
That "Downstream impact" metric sounds like a big yikes. Massive incentives to game that metric and before you know it you've got 10 projects all claiming credit for some theoretical downstream impact all of which are actuall
37.
by arder 12y ago
Isn't this an integral problem to the reddit model though, that you can point to half a million communities and say "Look, so many people doing so much good" while what many will point to is "look, you've made thous